Translating natural language into executable plans is a provably complex problem. LLMs can generate syntactically valid PDDL, which is prone to contain semantic errors. Current state-of-the-art systems tend to bypass this issue, by relying on pre-defined ground-truth domains, or skipping structural validation altogether, trusting the LLM’s own self-consistency. To bridge this gap, we introduce LAPI(S)². Our system uses symbolic and semantic checks to iteratively improve the generated symbolic domains, guaranteeing the successful execution of resulting plans in ground-truth scenarios. We tested LAPI(S)² on seven standard International Planning Competition (IPC) domains against baselines like LLM+P and NL2Plan. Zero-shot self-consistency improves by +29% over LLM+P. Most importantly, an average success rate of 73% is achieved for plans in real simulators, while the baselines failed completely with a 0% success rate. Demo website: https://emanuelemusumeci.github.io/LAPIS/, Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDj76jpD9g4

LAPI(S)²: Language to Action Planning via Iterative Schema Synthesis / Musumeci, E., Drid, A.H., Cassini, F., Nardi, D., Suriani, V.. - (2026). (ICAPS 2026, 36th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling Dublin, Ireland ).

LAPI(S)²: Language to Action Planning via Iterative Schema Synthesis

Musumeci, Emanuele;Cassini, Francesco;Nardi, Daniele;Suriani, Vincenzo
2026

Abstract

Translating natural language into executable plans is a provably complex problem. LLMs can generate syntactically valid PDDL, which is prone to contain semantic errors. Current state-of-the-art systems tend to bypass this issue, by relying on pre-defined ground-truth domains, or skipping structural validation altogether, trusting the LLM’s own self-consistency. To bridge this gap, we introduce LAPI(S)². Our system uses symbolic and semantic checks to iteratively improve the generated symbolic domains, guaranteeing the successful execution of resulting plans in ground-truth scenarios. We tested LAPI(S)² on seven standard International Planning Competition (IPC) domains against baselines like LLM+P and NL2Plan. Zero-shot self-consistency improves by +29% over LLM+P. Most importantly, an average success rate of 73% is achieved for plans in real simulators, while the baselines failed completely with a 0% success rate. Demo website: https://emanuelemusumeci.github.io/LAPIS/, Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDj76jpD9g4
2026
ICAPS 2026, 36th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Large Language Models; PDDL; Automated Planning; Neuro-symbolic AI
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
LAPI(S)²: Language to Action Planning via Iterative Schema Synthesis / Musumeci, E., Drid, A.H., Cassini, F., Nardi, D., Suriani, V.. - (2026). (ICAPS 2026, 36th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling Dublin, Ireland ).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1778495
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact