As a result of the high impacts of the transportation sector (8.8 GT CO2 eq in 2022), the European Parliament will force the EU to register only zero-emission cars, such as electric vehicles. This could pose issues related to battery disposal and overuse of critical raw materials, which is why, an interesting solution to reduce this burden could be the second life. Therefore, in this research, the impacts of second-life lithium-iron-phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries will be verified using the life-cycle perspective, taking Enel Green Power's "Second Life" project as a case study. It is shown how through the reuse of LiFePO4 batteries, ‒49.65 kg CO2 eq, ‒7.15 kg 1.4-DCB eq, ‒1.52 kg Cu eq, and ‒10.98 kg oil eq could be avoided, as well as additional social risks that could potentially be faced, such as child and forced labor, risk of non-fatal accidents, human trafficking, and risk of low wages.

Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LiFePO4) Batteries: 1st life vs 2nd life / Vinci, Giuliana; CAROBENE ARANGIA, Vittorio; Ruggeri, Marco; Gobbi, Laura. - (2025), pp. 540-548. (Intervento presentato al convegno XVIII Convegno dell’Associazione Rete Italiana LCA: Life Cycle Thinking a supporto di modelli di produzione e di consumo sostenibili tenutosi a Pescara).

Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LiFePO4) Batteries: 1st life vs 2nd life

Giuliana Vinci;Vittorio Carobene Arangia;Marco Ruggeri
;
Laura Gobbi
2025

Abstract

As a result of the high impacts of the transportation sector (8.8 GT CO2 eq in 2022), the European Parliament will force the EU to register only zero-emission cars, such as electric vehicles. This could pose issues related to battery disposal and overuse of critical raw materials, which is why, an interesting solution to reduce this burden could be the second life. Therefore, in this research, the impacts of second-life lithium-iron-phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries will be verified using the life-cycle perspective, taking Enel Green Power's "Second Life" project as a case study. It is shown how through the reuse of LiFePO4 batteries, ‒49.65 kg CO2 eq, ‒7.15 kg 1.4-DCB eq, ‒1.52 kg Cu eq, and ‒10.98 kg oil eq could be avoided, as well as additional social risks that could potentially be faced, such as child and forced labor, risk of non-fatal accidents, human trafficking, and risk of low wages.
2025
XVIII Convegno dell’Associazione Rete Italiana LCA: Life Cycle Thinking a supporto di modelli di produzione e di consumo sostenibili
LiFePO4 Batteries; Second Life; Reuse; Recycling; Life Cycle Thinking
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LiFePO4) Batteries: 1st life vs 2nd life / Vinci, Giuliana; CAROBENE ARANGIA, Vittorio; Ruggeri, Marco; Gobbi, Laura. - (2025), pp. 540-548. (Intervento presentato al convegno XVIII Convegno dell’Associazione Rete Italiana LCA: Life Cycle Thinking a supporto di modelli di produzione e di consumo sostenibili tenutosi a Pescara).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1736403
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact