This article introduces the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15, a brief clinician-rated tool for an ipsative assessment of interpersonal guilt as conceived in Control-Mastery Theory (CMT; Silberschatz, 2015; Weiss, 1993), and its psychometric proprieties. The items of the IGRS-15 were derived from the CMT clinical and empirical literature about guilt, and from the authors’ clinical experiences. 28 clinicians assessed 154 patients with the IGRS-15, the patient self-reported Interpersonal Guilt Questionnaire-67 (IGQ-67; O'Connor et al. 1997), and the Clinical Data Form (CDF; Westen, Shedler, 1999). A semi-exploratory factor analysis pointed to a four-factor solution in line with the kinds of guilt described in CMT: Survivor guilt, Separation/disloyalty guilt, Omnipotent responsibility guilt and Self-hate. The test-retest reliability of the IGRS-15 was good. Moreover, the IGRS-15 showed good concurrent and discriminant validity with the IGQ-67. IGRS-15 represents a first step in the direction of supporting the clinical judgement about interpersonal guilt with an empirically sound and easy-to-use tool.

Reliability and validity of the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15. A new clinician-reporting Tool for assessing interpersonal guilt according to Control-Mastery Theory / Gazzillo, Francesco; Bernard, Gorman; Marshall, Bush; George, Silberschatz; Mazza, Cristina; Faccini, Filippo; Valeria, Crisafulli; Roberta, Alesiani; DE LUCA, Emma. - In: PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 2162-2590. - ELETTRONICO. - 45:3(2017), pp. 362-384. [10.1521/pdps.2017.45.3.362]

Reliability and validity of the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15. A new clinician-reporting Tool for assessing interpersonal guilt according to Control-Mastery Theory

GAZZILLO, FRANCESCO
Project Administration
;
MAZZA, CRISTINA
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
FACCINI, FILIPPO
Methodology
;
DE LUCA, EMMA
Membro del Collaboration Group
2017

Abstract

This article introduces the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15, a brief clinician-rated tool for an ipsative assessment of interpersonal guilt as conceived in Control-Mastery Theory (CMT; Silberschatz, 2015; Weiss, 1993), and its psychometric proprieties. The items of the IGRS-15 were derived from the CMT clinical and empirical literature about guilt, and from the authors’ clinical experiences. 28 clinicians assessed 154 patients with the IGRS-15, the patient self-reported Interpersonal Guilt Questionnaire-67 (IGQ-67; O'Connor et al. 1997), and the Clinical Data Form (CDF; Westen, Shedler, 1999). A semi-exploratory factor analysis pointed to a four-factor solution in line with the kinds of guilt described in CMT: Survivor guilt, Separation/disloyalty guilt, Omnipotent responsibility guilt and Self-hate. The test-retest reliability of the IGRS-15 was good. Moreover, the IGRS-15 showed good concurrent and discriminant validity with the IGQ-67. IGRS-15 represents a first step in the direction of supporting the clinical judgement about interpersonal guilt with an empirically sound and easy-to-use tool.
2017
assessment; guilt; control-mastery theory; clinician report; factor analysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Reliability and validity of the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15. A new clinician-reporting Tool for assessing interpersonal guilt according to Control-Mastery Theory / Gazzillo, Francesco; Bernard, Gorman; Marshall, Bush; George, Silberschatz; Mazza, Cristina; Faccini, Filippo; Valeria, Crisafulli; Roberta, Alesiani; DE LUCA, Emma. - In: PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 2162-2590. - ELETTRONICO. - 45:3(2017), pp. 362-384. [10.1521/pdps.2017.45.3.362]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Gazzillo_Reliability_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 311.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
311.03 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/954523
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact