Background During the past decade a debate has arisen on the possible utility of genomic science for public health purposes. Within this context, we aim to conduct a survey to assess the attitudes of European public health (PH) professionals belonging to EUPHA network regarding their role in the implementation of public health genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services. Methods A pilot on-line survey was conducted on PH professionals that attended EUPHA 2015 Conference’s session on PHG, to ensure practicability, validity and interpretation of the questionnaire. The survey tool is composed of 5 sections: Personal details, Professional activity, Knowledge on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on the role of public health professionals in PHG. Results 34 people responded to the questionnaire, mostly female (78,6%) and medical doctors (71,4%). PHG was not addressed during the undergraduate training for any of respondents. Only 35.7% of them correctly identified all evidence-based applications of genetic testing and 42.9% knew all the components of a genetic service. There is no clear-cut opinion on the risk that PHG may divert efforts and resources from addressing social and environmental causes of ill health (42.9% thought it may). Over 85% of respondents thought PHG needs to be grounded on evidence of effectiveness and costeffectiveness. 15 to 21% of respondents disagreed with the proposed roles of PH professionals in PHG. Comments provided to the questionnaire suggested to simplify the language and rephrase some of the questions in order to increase the number of negative items. Conclusions This pilot study showed a positive attitude but the need to improve knowledge of PH professionals on PHG. It provided useful input for the implementation of the survey to all members of the EUPHA network. Key messages: Public Health Genomics (PHG) is not commonly addressed in undergraduate training and an effort should be made to develop specific curricula on PHG in public health postgraduate training programmes The results of EUPHA’s survey on knowledge and attitudes on PHG will provide a useful background to develop strategies to foster the incorporation of genomics into public health practice in Europe
A pilot survey on knowledge and attitudes of public health professionals on public health genomics / Pitini, Erica; D'Andrea, Elvira; DI MARCO, Marco; Unim, BRIGID ANDOUNIMYE; Marzuillo, Carolina; DE VITO, Corrado; Villari, Paolo. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. - ISSN 1101-1262. - ELETTRONICO. - 26:suppl. 1(2016), pp. 189-190. (Intervento presentato al convegno 9th European Public Health Conference, "All for health, health for all". tenutosi a Vienna, Austria nel 9–12 November 2016) [10.1093/eurpub/ckw169.045].
A pilot survey on knowledge and attitudes of public health professionals on public health genomics
PITINI, ERICA;D'ANDREA, ELVIRA;DI MARCO, MARCO;UNIM, BRIGID ANDOUNIMYE;MARZUILLO, CAROLINA;DE VITO, CORRADO;VILLARI, Paolo
2016
Abstract
Background During the past decade a debate has arisen on the possible utility of genomic science for public health purposes. Within this context, we aim to conduct a survey to assess the attitudes of European public health (PH) professionals belonging to EUPHA network regarding their role in the implementation of public health genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services. Methods A pilot on-line survey was conducted on PH professionals that attended EUPHA 2015 Conference’s session on PHG, to ensure practicability, validity and interpretation of the questionnaire. The survey tool is composed of 5 sections: Personal details, Professional activity, Knowledge on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on the role of public health professionals in PHG. Results 34 people responded to the questionnaire, mostly female (78,6%) and medical doctors (71,4%). PHG was not addressed during the undergraduate training for any of respondents. Only 35.7% of them correctly identified all evidence-based applications of genetic testing and 42.9% knew all the components of a genetic service. There is no clear-cut opinion on the risk that PHG may divert efforts and resources from addressing social and environmental causes of ill health (42.9% thought it may). Over 85% of respondents thought PHG needs to be grounded on evidence of effectiveness and costeffectiveness. 15 to 21% of respondents disagreed with the proposed roles of PH professionals in PHG. Comments provided to the questionnaire suggested to simplify the language and rephrase some of the questions in order to increase the number of negative items. Conclusions This pilot study showed a positive attitude but the need to improve knowledge of PH professionals on PHG. It provided useful input for the implementation of the survey to all members of the EUPHA network. Key messages: Public Health Genomics (PHG) is not commonly addressed in undergraduate training and an effort should be made to develop specific curricula on PHG in public health postgraduate training programmes The results of EUPHA’s survey on knowledge and attitudes on PHG will provide a useful background to develop strategies to foster the incorporation of genomics into public health practice in EuropeFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Pitini_pilot_2016.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
31.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
31.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.