Since its introduction, the Rosenberg General Self-Esteem Scale (RGSE, Rosenberg, 1965) has been 1 of the most widely used measures of global self-esteem. We conducted 4 studies to investigate (a) the goodness-of-fit of a bifactor model positing a general self-esteem (GSE) factor and 2 specific factors grouping positive (MFP) and negative items (MFN) and (b) different kinds of validity of the GSE, MFN, and MFP factors of the RSGE. In the first study (n = 11,028), the fit of the bifactor model was compared with those of 9 alternative models proposed in literature for the RGSE. In Study 2 (n = 357), the external validities of GSE, MFP, and MFN were evaluated using objective grade point average data and multimethod measures of prosociality, aggression, and depression. In Study 3 (n = 565), the across-rater robustness of the bifactor model was evaluated. In Study 4, measurement invariance of the RGSE was further supported across samples in 3 European countries, Serbia (n = 1,010), Poland (n = 699), and Italy (n = 707), and in the United States (n = 1,192). All in all, psychometric findings corroborate the value and the robustness of the bifactor structure and its substantive interpretation.

On the factor structure of the rosenberg (1965) general self-esteem scale / Alessandri, Guido; Vecchione, Michele; Eisenberg, N.; Łaguna, M.. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 1040-3590. - STAMPA. - 27:2(2015), pp. 621-635. [10.1037/pas0000073]

On the factor structure of the rosenberg (1965) general self-esteem scale

VECCHIONE, MICHELE;
2015

Abstract

Since its introduction, the Rosenberg General Self-Esteem Scale (RGSE, Rosenberg, 1965) has been 1 of the most widely used measures of global self-esteem. We conducted 4 studies to investigate (a) the goodness-of-fit of a bifactor model positing a general self-esteem (GSE) factor and 2 specific factors grouping positive (MFP) and negative items (MFN) and (b) different kinds of validity of the GSE, MFN, and MFP factors of the RSGE. In the first study (n = 11,028), the fit of the bifactor model was compared with those of 9 alternative models proposed in literature for the RGSE. In Study 2 (n = 357), the external validities of GSE, MFP, and MFN were evaluated using objective grade point average data and multimethod measures of prosociality, aggression, and depression. In Study 3 (n = 565), the across-rater robustness of the bifactor model was evaluated. In Study 4, measurement invariance of the RGSE was further supported across samples in 3 European countries, Serbia (n = 1,010), Poland (n = 699), and Italy (n = 707), and in the United States (n = 1,192). All in all, psychometric findings corroborate the value and the robustness of the bifactor structure and its substantive interpretation.
2015
bifactor model; self-esteem; Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; method effects; method factors
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
On the factor structure of the rosenberg (1965) general self-esteem scale / Alessandri, Guido; Vecchione, Michele; Eisenberg, N.; Łaguna, M.. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 1040-3590. - STAMPA. - 27:2(2015), pp. 621-635. [10.1037/pas0000073]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Alessandri_On-the-factor_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.3 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/784356
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 97
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 93
social impact