Despite the increasing interest for the role of emotions on group collective efficacy beliefs (GCE; Bandura, 1997), literature on GCE in task and relationships management is abundant, whereas empirical studies on GCE in emotions management are still scarce, and fail to focus on emotions as a separate domain of group beliefs. The present study aimed at: a) investigating GCE in three different domains of task, relations, and emotion management; b) proposing an expanded approach to emotional contagion (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994) by simultaneously considering contagion both absorbed by (received) as well as issued towards others (sent); c) examining support by colleagues (SC) and support by leader (SL), understood as mutual helping behaviors respectively among teammates, and between leader and members (Drach-Zahavy, 2004); and d) testing a multilevel model wherein 1) EC (received and sent) predicts SL and SC, 2) three-factor GCE (task, relations, emotions) has both a direct effect
Despite the increasing interest for the role of emotions on group collective efficacy beliefs (GCE; Bandura, 1997), literature on GCE in task and relationships management is abundant, whereas empirical studies on GCE in emotions management are still scarce, and fail to focus on emotions as a separate domain of group beliefs. The present study aimed at: a) investigating GCE in three different domains of task, relations, and emotion management; b) proposing an expanded approach to emotional contagion (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994) by simultaneously considering contagion both absorbed by (received) as well as issued towards others (sent); c) examining support by colleagues (SC) and support by leader (SL), understood as mutual helping behaviors respectively among teammates, and between leader and members (Drach-Zahavy, 2004); and d) testing a multilevel model wherein 1) EC (received and sent) predicts SL and SC, 2) three-factor GCE (task, relations, emotions) has both a direct effect on SL and SC, and a moderating role respectively on the relationship between EC and SL, and EC and SC.
The Differential Moderating Role of Task, Relations, and Emotions Collective Efficacy on the Nexus between Emotional Contagion and Support in Teams / Petitta, Laura; Palange, M.; Ghezzi, V.; Sinato, E.. - (2014). (Intervento presentato al convegno 28th International Congress of Applied Psychology tenutosi a Parigi, Francia nel 8-13 Luglio 2014).
The Differential Moderating Role of Task, Relations, and Emotions Collective Efficacy on the Nexus between Emotional Contagion and Support in Teams.
PETITTA, LAURA;Ghezzi V.;
2014
Abstract
Despite the increasing interest for the role of emotions on group collective efficacy beliefs (GCE; Bandura, 1997), literature on GCE in task and relationships management is abundant, whereas empirical studies on GCE in emotions management are still scarce, and fail to focus on emotions as a separate domain of group beliefs. The present study aimed at: a) investigating GCE in three different domains of task, relations, and emotion management; b) proposing an expanded approach to emotional contagion (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994) by simultaneously considering contagion both absorbed by (received) as well as issued towards others (sent); c) examining support by colleagues (SC) and support by leader (SL), understood as mutual helping behaviors respectively among teammates, and between leader and members (Drach-Zahavy, 2004); and d) testing a multilevel model wherein 1) EC (received and sent) predicts SL and SC, 2) three-factor GCE (task, relations, emotions) has both a direct effectI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
