Despite the flourishing literature (De Witte, 2005; Diaz-Serrano & Cabral Vieira, 2005; Gazioglu & Tansel, 2002) on how insecure jobs trends (László et al., 2010) relate to individuals attitudes towards organizations, to their work productivity and health, no study has yet explored the conjoint influence of different theoretical culture models on both positive (i.e., job satisfaction; JS) and negative (i.e., turnover intentions; TI) indicators of employee well-being. The present study seeks to address this literature shortcoming. In particular, we aim to investigate how different theoretical culture models, namely GLOBE (House et al., 2004), Individualism/Collectivism (INDCOL; Singelis, 1995), and Intensity & Strength Organizational Culture Questionnaire (IS-OCQ; Petitta, Barbaranelli, & Probst, 2013), predict both positive (JS) and negative (TI) indicators of employee well-being. Participants (N=734) from different USA organizations were 63.7% female. The average tenure was 2.6 yrs (S

Despite the flourishing literature (De Witte, 2005; Diaz-Serrano & Cabral Vieira, 2005; Gazioglu & Tansel, 2002) on how insecure jobs trends (László et al., 2010) relate to individuals attitudes towards organizations, to their work productivity and health, no study has yet explored the conjoint influence of different theoretical culture models on both positive (i.e., job satisfaction; JS) and negative (i.e., turnover intentions; TI) indicators of employee well-being. The present study seeks to address this literature shortcoming. In particular, we aim to investigate how different theoretical culture models, namely GLOBE (House et al., 2004), Individualism/Collectivism (INDCOL; Singelis, 1995), and Intensity & Strength Organizational Culture Questionnaire (IS-OCQ; Petitta, Barbaranelli, & Probst, 2013), predict both positive (JS) and negative (TI) indicators of employee well-being. Participants (N=734) from different USA organizations were 63.7% female. The average tenure was 2.6 yrs (SD = 1.5). Participants returned an anonymous self-report questionnaire measuring: JS (Smith, Kendall, & Hulin, 1969); TI (Firth, Mellor, Moore, & Loquet, 2004); INDCOL; IS-OCQ, which measured autocratic, bureaucratic, clan-patronage, technocratic, and cooperative culture typologies; and GLOBE Values and Practices.

Comparing different culture models in predicting employee job satisfaction and turnover intentions / Petitta, Laura; Probst, T. M.; Ghezzi, V.; Barbaranelli, Claudio. - (2014). (Intervento presentato al convegno 28th International Congress of Applied Psychology - ICAP tenutosi a Parigi, Francia nel 8-13 Luglio 2014).

Comparing different culture models in predicting employee job satisfaction and turnover intentions.

PETITTA, LAURA;Ghezzi V.;BARBARANELLI, Claudio
2014

Abstract

Despite the flourishing literature (De Witte, 2005; Diaz-Serrano & Cabral Vieira, 2005; Gazioglu & Tansel, 2002) on how insecure jobs trends (László et al., 2010) relate to individuals attitudes towards organizations, to their work productivity and health, no study has yet explored the conjoint influence of different theoretical culture models on both positive (i.e., job satisfaction; JS) and negative (i.e., turnover intentions; TI) indicators of employee well-being. The present study seeks to address this literature shortcoming. In particular, we aim to investigate how different theoretical culture models, namely GLOBE (House et al., 2004), Individualism/Collectivism (INDCOL; Singelis, 1995), and Intensity & Strength Organizational Culture Questionnaire (IS-OCQ; Petitta, Barbaranelli, & Probst, 2013), predict both positive (JS) and negative (TI) indicators of employee well-being. Participants (N=734) from different USA organizations were 63.7% female. The average tenure was 2.6 yrs (S
2014
Despite the flourishing literature (De Witte, 2005; Diaz-Serrano & Cabral Vieira, 2005; Gazioglu & Tansel, 2002) on how insecure jobs trends (László et al., 2010) relate to individuals attitudes towards organizations, to their work productivity and health, no study has yet explored the conjoint influence of different theoretical culture models on both positive (i.e., job satisfaction; JS) and negative (i.e., turnover intentions; TI) indicators of employee well-being. The present study seeks to address this literature shortcoming. In particular, we aim to investigate how different theoretical culture models, namely GLOBE (House et al., 2004), Individualism/Collectivism (INDCOL; Singelis, 1995), and Intensity & Strength Organizational Culture Questionnaire (IS-OCQ; Petitta, Barbaranelli, & Probst, 2013), predict both positive (JS) and negative (TI) indicators of employee well-being. Participants (N=734) from different USA organizations were 63.7% female. The average tenure was 2.6 yrs (SD = 1.5). Participants returned an anonymous self-report questionnaire measuring: JS (Smith, Kendall, & Hulin, 1969); TI (Firth, Mellor, Moore, & Loquet, 2004); INDCOL; IS-OCQ, which measured autocratic, bureaucratic, clan-patronage, technocratic, and cooperative culture typologies; and GLOBE Values and Practices.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/628987
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact