This research investigated the nature of the method effect associated with positively worded items of the Life Orientation Test–Revised. In a first cross-sectional study (N =11,028) the best fitting model posits 2 factors, representing general optimism and a specific factor associated with positive items. In a second longitudinal study (N = 203), a unified latent curve latent state–trait model was used to assess the developmental trajectory of the specific factor from 16 to 20 years. This factor contains a prevalence of trait versus state variance, and presents a relationship pattern with external criteria (e.g., depression) that differ from the one involving general optimism.

This research investigated the nature of the method effect associated with positively worded items of the Life Orientation Test-Revised. In a first cross-sectional study (N=11,028) the best fitting model posits 2 factors, representing general optimism and a specific factor associated with positive items. In a second longitudinal study (N=203), a unified latent curve latent state-trait model was used to assess the developmental trajectory of the specific factor from 16 to 20 years. This factor contains a prevalence of trait versus state variance, and presents a relationship pattern with external criteria (e.g., depression) that differ from the one involving general optimism.

Are Method Effects Permanent or Ephemeral in Nature? The Case of the Revised Life Orientation Test / Vecchione, Michele; Alessandri, Guido; Caprara, Gian Vittorio; John, Tisak. - In: STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. - ISSN 1070-5511. - STAMPA. - 21:1(2014), pp. 117-130. [10.1080/10705511.2014.859511]

Are Method Effects Permanent or Ephemeral in Nature? The Case of the Revised Life Orientation Test

VECCHIONE, MICHELE;ALESSANDRI, GUIDO;CAPRARA, Gian Vittorio;
2014

Abstract

This research investigated the nature of the method effect associated with positively worded items of the Life Orientation Test–Revised. In a first cross-sectional study (N =11,028) the best fitting model posits 2 factors, representing general optimism and a specific factor associated with positive items. In a second longitudinal study (N = 203), a unified latent curve latent state–trait model was used to assess the developmental trajectory of the specific factor from 16 to 20 years. This factor contains a prevalence of trait versus state variance, and presents a relationship pattern with external criteria (e.g., depression) that differ from the one involving general optimism.
2014
This research investigated the nature of the method effect associated with positively worded items of the Life Orientation Test-Revised. In a first cross-sectional study (N=11,028) the best fitting model posits 2 factors, representing general optimism and a specific factor associated with positive items. In a second longitudinal study (N=203), a unified latent curve latent state-trait model was used to assess the developmental trajectory of the specific factor from 16 to 20 years. This factor contains a prevalence of trait versus state variance, and presents a relationship pattern with external criteria (e.g., depression) that differ from the one involving general optimism.
life orientation test; method factor; latent state-trait model; optimism; growth curve
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Are Method Effects Permanent or Ephemeral in Nature? The Case of the Revised Life Orientation Test / Vecchione, Michele; Alessandri, Guido; Caprara, Gian Vittorio; John, Tisak. - In: STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. - ISSN 1070-5511. - STAMPA. - 21:1(2014), pp. 117-130. [10.1080/10705511.2014.859511]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/557659
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact