Purpose: The Language Development Survey (LDS) was used to compare Italian and English lexical development. We addressed the issue of universal versus language-specific aspects of lexical development by testing language, age, and gender effects on vocabulary scores and by comparing vocabulary composition across languages. We addressed the issue of delay versus deviance by comparing vocabulary composition in late talkers and younger vocabulary size-matched children. Methods: Participants were 398 Italian and 206 U.S children ages 18-35 months. Results: Vocabulary size did not differ significantly by language, and age and gender effects on vocabulary size were not moderated by language. The Italian-English Q correlation for percentage word use scores was .55, lower than within-language concordance of >.90. Cross-linguistic concordance declined as age and vocabulary size increased. Many cross-linguistic word matches (63 words) were found among the “top 100” words. Italian late talkers were similar to younger vocabulary size-matched Italian children in vocabulary composition, consistent with findings for English, Greek, and Korean. Conclusions: In both languages, the early lexicons of late talkers and typical talkers contained many of the same words, indicating considerable universality in young children’s lexical development. These common words are therefore good targets for clinical intervention.

Typical and Delayed Lexical Development in Italian / L., Rescorla; A., Frigerio; M., Sali; Spataro, Pietro; Longobardi, Emiddia. - In: JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH. - ISSN 1092-4388. - STAMPA. - 57:(2014), pp. 1792-1803. [10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0242]

Typical and Delayed Lexical Development in Italian

SPATARO, PIETRO;LONGOBARDI, Emiddia
2014

Abstract

Purpose: The Language Development Survey (LDS) was used to compare Italian and English lexical development. We addressed the issue of universal versus language-specific aspects of lexical development by testing language, age, and gender effects on vocabulary scores and by comparing vocabulary composition across languages. We addressed the issue of delay versus deviance by comparing vocabulary composition in late talkers and younger vocabulary size-matched children. Methods: Participants were 398 Italian and 206 U.S children ages 18-35 months. Results: Vocabulary size did not differ significantly by language, and age and gender effects on vocabulary size were not moderated by language. The Italian-English Q correlation for percentage word use scores was .55, lower than within-language concordance of >.90. Cross-linguistic concordance declined as age and vocabulary size increased. Many cross-linguistic word matches (63 words) were found among the “top 100” words. Italian late talkers were similar to younger vocabulary size-matched Italian children in vocabulary composition, consistent with findings for English, Greek, and Korean. Conclusions: In both languages, the early lexicons of late talkers and typical talkers contained many of the same words, indicating considerable universality in young children’s lexical development. These common words are therefore good targets for clinical intervention.
2014
language development; lexicon; late talking
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Typical and Delayed Lexical Development in Italian / L., Rescorla; A., Frigerio; M., Sali; Spataro, Pietro; Longobardi, Emiddia. - In: JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH. - ISSN 1092-4388. - STAMPA. - 57:(2014), pp. 1792-1803. [10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0242]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/553476
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact