The new 1-phenyl-5-(1 H-pyrrol-1-yl)pyrazole-3-carboxamides were compared with the reference compounds AM251 and SR144528 for cannabinoid hCB1 and hCB2 receptor affinity. Compounds bearing 2,4-dichlorophenyl or 2,4-difluorophenyl groups at position 1 and 2,5-dimethylpyrrole moiety at position 5 of the pyrazole nucleus were generally more selective for hCB1. On the other hand, the N-cyclohexyl group at the 3-carboxamide was the determinant for the hCB2 selectivity, in particular when a 3,4-dichlorophenyl group was also present at position 1. Compound 26 was the most selective ligand for the hCB1 receptor (Ki(CB2)/Ki(CB1) = 140.7). Derivative 30, the most potent hCB1 ligand ( Ki = 5.6 nanoM), was equipotent to AM251 and behaved as an inverse agonist in the cAMP assay (EC50 approximately 1 nanoM). The carbonyl oxygen of both 26 and 30 formed a H-bond with K3.28(192), while the substituents at the nitrogen fitted in a pocket formed by lipophilic residues. This H-bonding interaction was proposed to account for the high affinity for receptors' inactive state and the inverse agonist activity.
Synthesis, Cannabinoid Receptor Affinity and Molecular Modeling Studies of Substituted 1-Aryl-5-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamides / Silvestri, Romano; Cascio, M. G.; LA REGINA, Giuseppe; Piscitelli, Francesco; Lavecchia, A.; Brizzi, A.; Pasquini, S.; Botta, M.; Novellino, E.; DI MARZO, V.; Corelli, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 0022-2623. - 51:(2008), pp. 1560-1576. [10.1021/jm070566z]
Synthesis, Cannabinoid Receptor Affinity and Molecular Modeling Studies of Substituted 1-Aryl-5-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamides.
SILVESTRI, Romano;LA REGINA, GIUSEPPE;PISCITELLI, FRANCESCO;
2008
Abstract
The new 1-phenyl-5-(1 H-pyrrol-1-yl)pyrazole-3-carboxamides were compared with the reference compounds AM251 and SR144528 for cannabinoid hCB1 and hCB2 receptor affinity. Compounds bearing 2,4-dichlorophenyl or 2,4-difluorophenyl groups at position 1 and 2,5-dimethylpyrrole moiety at position 5 of the pyrazole nucleus were generally more selective for hCB1. On the other hand, the N-cyclohexyl group at the 3-carboxamide was the determinant for the hCB2 selectivity, in particular when a 3,4-dichlorophenyl group was also present at position 1. Compound 26 was the most selective ligand for the hCB1 receptor (Ki(CB2)/Ki(CB1) = 140.7). Derivative 30, the most potent hCB1 ligand ( Ki = 5.6 nanoM), was equipotent to AM251 and behaved as an inverse agonist in the cAMP assay (EC50 approximately 1 nanoM). The carbonyl oxygen of both 26 and 30 formed a H-bond with K3.28(192), while the substituents at the nitrogen fitted in a pocket formed by lipophilic residues. This H-bonding interaction was proposed to account for the high affinity for receptors' inactive state and the inverse agonist activity.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.