BACKGROUND/AIMS: Unsatisfactory functional results have been reported not only after coloanal anastomosis, but also after anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis. The aim of this study is to establish functional outcome predictive factors related to surgical technique and especially the real impact of residual rectum length to identify patients who could benefit from colonic pouch reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: Sphincter preservation was achieved in 214 of 327 patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer. Patients have been subdivided according to the level of anastomosis measured by a rigid proctoscope from the anal verge. In 93 patients functional results have been assessed by clinical control and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Functional alterations such as leakage (13%), incontinence (5%), urgency (5%) and difficulty in evacuation (10%) appeared in patients who underwent anterior resection with anastomosis 4 to 6 cm from the anal verge. Nevertheless, comparing anterior resection with anastomosis 6 to 8 cm and that with anastomosis 4 to 6 cm rectal compliance was the only parameter whose difference is statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This result makes us to believe that patients who undergo anterior resection with no more than 2-3 cm of residual rectum could benefit from a colonic pouch reconstruction.

Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of the anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study / Montesani, Chiara; Pronio, Annamaria; Santella, S; Boschetto, A; Aguzzi, D; Pirozzi, R; D'Amato, Alberto; Vestri, Anna Rita. - In: HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0172-6390. - STAMPA. - 51:57(2004), pp. 718-721.

Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of the anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study

MONTESANI, Chiara;PRONIO, Annamaria;D'AMATO, Alberto;VESTRI, Anna Rita
2004

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Unsatisfactory functional results have been reported not only after coloanal anastomosis, but also after anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis. The aim of this study is to establish functional outcome predictive factors related to surgical technique and especially the real impact of residual rectum length to identify patients who could benefit from colonic pouch reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: Sphincter preservation was achieved in 214 of 327 patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer. Patients have been subdivided according to the level of anastomosis measured by a rigid proctoscope from the anal verge. In 93 patients functional results have been assessed by clinical control and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Functional alterations such as leakage (13%), incontinence (5%), urgency (5%) and difficulty in evacuation (10%) appeared in patients who underwent anterior resection with anastomosis 4 to 6 cm from the anal verge. Nevertheless, comparing anterior resection with anastomosis 6 to 8 cm and that with anastomosis 4 to 6 cm rectal compliance was the only parameter whose difference is statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This result makes us to believe that patients who undergo anterior resection with no more than 2-3 cm of residual rectum could benefit from a colonic pouch reconstruction.
2004
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of the anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study / Montesani, Chiara; Pronio, Annamaria; Santella, S; Boschetto, A; Aguzzi, D; Pirozzi, R; D'Amato, Alberto; Vestri, Anna Rita. - In: HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0172-6390. - STAMPA. - 51:57(2004), pp. 718-721.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/235500
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact