We prove an exponential lower bound for tree-like Cut- ting Planes refutations of a set of clauses which has polyno- mial size resolution refutations. This implies an exponential separation between tree-like and dag-like proofs for both Cutting Planes and resolution; in both cases only superpoly- nomial separations were known before [30, 20, 10]. In or- der to prove this, we extend the lower bounds on the depth of monotone circuits of Raz and McKenzie [26] to monotone real circuits. In the case of resolution, we further improve this result by giving an exponential separation of tree-like resolution from (dag-like) regular resolution proofs. In fact, the refu- tation provided to give the upper bound respects the stronger restriction of being a Davis-Putnam resolution proof. This extends the corresponding superpolynomial separation of [30]. Finally, we prove an exponential separation between Davis-Putnam resolution and unrestricted resolution proofs; only a superpolynomial separation was previously known [14].
Exponential Separations between Restricted Resolution and Cutting Planes Proof Systems / BONET M., L; Esteban, J. L.; Galesi, Nicola; Johannsen, J.. - STAMPA. - 39:(1998), pp. 638-647. (Intervento presentato al convegno 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS '98, tenutosi a Palo Alto, California, USA.) [10.1109/SFCS.1998.743514].
Exponential Separations between Restricted Resolution and Cutting Planes Proof Systems
GALESI, NICOLA
;
1998
Abstract
We prove an exponential lower bound for tree-like Cut- ting Planes refutations of a set of clauses which has polyno- mial size resolution refutations. This implies an exponential separation between tree-like and dag-like proofs for both Cutting Planes and resolution; in both cases only superpoly- nomial separations were known before [30, 20, 10]. In or- der to prove this, we extend the lower bounds on the depth of monotone circuits of Raz and McKenzie [26] to monotone real circuits. In the case of resolution, we further improve this result by giving an exponential separation of tree-like resolution from (dag-like) regular resolution proofs. In fact, the refu- tation provided to give the upper bound respects the stronger restriction of being a Davis-Putnam resolution proof. This extends the corresponding superpolynomial separation of [30]. Finally, we prove an exponential separation between Davis-Putnam resolution and unrestricted resolution proofs; only a superpolynomial separation was previously known [14].I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.