Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women worldwide, yet the clinical and algorithmic infrastructure of cardiovascular medicine was constructed around a male prototype. The convergence of artificial intelligence, big data, wearable technologies and telemedicine, collectively termed Medicine 4.0, offers transformative potential for sex- and gender-specific cardiology. However, these tools risk perpetuating and algorithmically entrenching the sex and gender biases embedded in historical clinical datasets. This paper examines the mechanistic underpinnings of algorithmic sex/gender bias in cardiovascular artificial intelligence across six interacting bias categories, analyzes the epistemic risks of binary sex stratification in machine learning and proposes a structured operational framework comprising gender-aware clinical prompt engineering, a threephase model for responsible artificial intelligence interaction and a coordinated agenda spanning data governance, algorithmic design, clinical education and regulatory oversight. Grounded in the Lancet Commission on Gender and Global Health's framing of gender distortion in health systems as a driver of structural injustice, this framework argues that precision cardiovascular medicine is scientifically meaningful only when it is equitable.
Sex, gender and artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine 4.0 / Moscucci, F., Sciomer, S., Nodari, S., Paolillo, S., Renda, G., Gallina, S., Mattioli, A.V.. - In: MATURITAS. - ISSN 0378-5122. - 214:(2026). [10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.109107]
Sex, gender and artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine 4.0
Moscucci, Federica
Primo
;Sciomer, Susanna;
2026
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women worldwide, yet the clinical and algorithmic infrastructure of cardiovascular medicine was constructed around a male prototype. The convergence of artificial intelligence, big data, wearable technologies and telemedicine, collectively termed Medicine 4.0, offers transformative potential for sex- and gender-specific cardiology. However, these tools risk perpetuating and algorithmically entrenching the sex and gender biases embedded in historical clinical datasets. This paper examines the mechanistic underpinnings of algorithmic sex/gender bias in cardiovascular artificial intelligence across six interacting bias categories, analyzes the epistemic risks of binary sex stratification in machine learning and proposes a structured operational framework comprising gender-aware clinical prompt engineering, a threephase model for responsible artificial intelligence interaction and a coordinated agenda spanning data governance, algorithmic design, clinical education and regulatory oversight. Grounded in the Lancet Commission on Gender and Global Health's framing of gender distortion in health systems as a driver of structural injustice, this framework argues that precision cardiovascular medicine is scientifically meaningful only when it is equitable.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


