The issues of work constitute one of the main threads in Honneth’s thinking, from his very first writings to his latest publications. Honneth’s thought has changed considerably over the years in the way he has declined these issues. In his latest reflection, fully developed in his last book, The Working Sovereign, Honneth’s focus shifts once again. Labour and Democratic Citizenship Honneth’s focus shifts once again. His interest is to consider work primarily for its essential importance in democratic societies, for its potential contribution to the formation of a democratic political culture capable of reactivating the foundations of democracy. The article aims to focus on a tension within Honneth’s latest reflection between a conventionalist conception of work and a deliberative proceduralist conception of democracy, on the one hand, and a critique of capitalistic work conditions, on the other hand, that seems in need of a reference to a more substantive conception of social work and a more finalistic approach to democracy.

Work, democracy and the limits of proceduralism. Discussing Honneth’s theory of work / Fazio, G.. - In: CRITICAL HORIZONS. - ISSN 1440-9917. - (2026). [10.1080/14409917.2026.2704283]

Work, democracy and the limits of proceduralism. Discussing Honneth’s theory of work

giorgio fazio
2026

Abstract

The issues of work constitute one of the main threads in Honneth’s thinking, from his very first writings to his latest publications. Honneth’s thought has changed considerably over the years in the way he has declined these issues. In his latest reflection, fully developed in his last book, The Working Sovereign, Honneth’s focus shifts once again. Labour and Democratic Citizenship Honneth’s focus shifts once again. His interest is to consider work primarily for its essential importance in democratic societies, for its potential contribution to the formation of a democratic political culture capable of reactivating the foundations of democracy. The article aims to focus on a tension within Honneth’s latest reflection between a conventionalist conception of work and a deliberative proceduralist conception of democracy, on the one hand, and a critique of capitalistic work conditions, on the other hand, that seems in need of a reference to a more substantive conception of social work and a more finalistic approach to democracy.
2026
work; democracy; proceduralism; capitalism; finalism
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Work, democracy and the limits of proceduralism. Discussing Honneth’s theory of work / Fazio, G.. - In: CRITICAL HORIZONS. - ISSN 1440-9917. - (2026). [10.1080/14409917.2026.2704283]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Fazio_Work-democracy-and-the-limits-of-proceduralism_2026.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 522.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
522.35 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1774212
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact