Objective. To evaluate the prognostic significance of surgical margins in patients undergoing transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing oncologic outcomes between positive and negative resection margins were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model to account for inter-study variability. Results. A total of 26 studies, including 5,463 patients, met inclusion criteria. The pooled log-HR for DFS was 0.93 (p < 0.05), indicating a significantly higher risk of recurrence in patients with positive margins. However, no significant differences were observed for LC (log-HR =-0.76, p = 0.59) or OS (log-HR = 0.16, p = 0.40). Conclusions. While positive surgical margins significantly impact DFS, their effect on LC and OS remains uncertain. Further prospective studies are necessary to refine treatment guidelines and optimise oncologic outcomes.
Prognostic significance of surgical margins in laryngeal cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Virgilio, A. D.; Pagliuca, G.; Russo, E.; Crosetti, E.; Motta, G.; Peretti, G.; Greco, A.; Succo, G.; De Vincentiis, M.; Gallo, A.. - In: ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA. - ISSN 1827-675X. - 45:Suppl. 1(2025), pp. 71-86. [10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1142]
Prognostic significance of surgical margins in laryngeal cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Virgilio A. D.;Pagliuca G.;Russo E.
;Peretti G.;Greco A.;de Vincentiis M.;Gallo A.
2025
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the prognostic significance of surgical margins in patients undergoing transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing oncologic outcomes between positive and negative resection margins were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model to account for inter-study variability. Results. A total of 26 studies, including 5,463 patients, met inclusion criteria. The pooled log-HR for DFS was 0.93 (p < 0.05), indicating a significantly higher risk of recurrence in patients with positive margins. However, no significant differences were observed for LC (log-HR =-0.76, p = 0.59) or OS (log-HR = 0.16, p = 0.40). Conclusions. While positive surgical margins significantly impact DFS, their effect on LC and OS remains uncertain. Further prospective studies are necessary to refine treatment guidelines and optimise oncologic outcomes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
DeVirgilio_Prognostic-significance_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
320.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
320.69 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


