The development of wearable robots is inherently challenging due to their interaction with the complex structure of the human body. Full kinematic compatibility (FKC) between the exoskeleton and the user is rarely achieved, resulting in misalignments between robot joints and anatomical ones, hindering the movement of the user and compromising the effectiveness of the device. This study presents three distinct ankle exoskeleton joint designs and evaluates their effectiveness through physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) by measuring force exchanges at the interfaces. Each joint design differs in terms of kinematic configuration and Degrees of Freedom (DoF). The upper and lower braces of the exoskeleton have been equipped with three force-sensitive resistors (FSRs) each to monitor the pressure in the front, lateral, and rear regions of the braces. The three different joints were tested during a walking trial performed on a treadmill at 3.5 km/h. Ten healthy subjects participated in the experiment. The analysis of the experimental results, using a repeated measure ANOVA, revealed significant differences in the distribution of forces. The study's findings underscore the critical role of joint design in enhancing pHRI, indicating that the slider joint, among those tested in this study, provides an optimal balance between mechanical functionality and user comfort.

Optimal Joint Configuration for Ankle Exoskeleton: Force-Based Evaluation of Three Different Designs / Liguori, Lorenzo; Alimonti, Sara; Del Prete, Zaccaria; Palermo, Eduardo. - (2025), pp. 1-6. ( 2025 IEEE Medical Measurements & Applications (MeMeA) Chania, Greece ) [10.1109/memea65319.2025.11067982].

Optimal Joint Configuration for Ankle Exoskeleton: Force-Based Evaluation of Three Different Designs

Liguori, Lorenzo
Primo
;
Alimonti, Sara
Secondo
;
Del Prete, Zaccaria
Penultimo
;
Palermo, Eduardo
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

The development of wearable robots is inherently challenging due to their interaction with the complex structure of the human body. Full kinematic compatibility (FKC) between the exoskeleton and the user is rarely achieved, resulting in misalignments between robot joints and anatomical ones, hindering the movement of the user and compromising the effectiveness of the device. This study presents three distinct ankle exoskeleton joint designs and evaluates their effectiveness through physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) by measuring force exchanges at the interfaces. Each joint design differs in terms of kinematic configuration and Degrees of Freedom (DoF). The upper and lower braces of the exoskeleton have been equipped with three force-sensitive resistors (FSRs) each to monitor the pressure in the front, lateral, and rear regions of the braces. The three different joints were tested during a walking trial performed on a treadmill at 3.5 km/h. Ten healthy subjects participated in the experiment. The analysis of the experimental results, using a repeated measure ANOVA, revealed significant differences in the distribution of forces. The study's findings underscore the critical role of joint design in enhancing pHRI, indicating that the slider joint, among those tested in this study, provides an optimal balance between mechanical functionality and user comfort.
2025
2025 IEEE Medical Measurements & Applications (MeMeA)
exoskeletons , wearable robots , physical human-robot interaction , forces , ankle exoskeleton
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Optimal Joint Configuration for Ankle Exoskeleton: Force-Based Evaluation of Three Different Designs / Liguori, Lorenzo; Alimonti, Sara; Del Prete, Zaccaria; Palermo, Eduardo. - (2025), pp. 1-6. ( 2025 IEEE Medical Measurements & Applications (MeMeA) Chania, Greece ) [10.1109/memea65319.2025.11067982].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1742917
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact