The East African Groundnut Scheme in Tanganyika is probably the most dramatic and most cited failure of the ambitions of British late colonial developmentalism. Issues of labour supply in the scheme’s short history, and the relationship of labour supply with the peasant economy of Province, have received almost no attention, a gap which this article aims to begin to fill. It suggests that the implementation of the scheme gave rise to a political battle over labour market control between the colonial state in Tanganyika and scheme managers. The paper documents how, without any support from the colonial administration, the scheme attempted to recruit the large numbers of workers it required, and its frustrations in doing so. It investigates the factors that prevented labour supply satisfying demand, how peasants in the area engaged with the labour market (and were able to adjust their participation in it), and the impact of labour market growth on the household farm economy.
What was left of the groundnut scheme: Development Disaster and Labour Market in Southern Tanganyika 1946-1952 / Rizzo, M. - In: JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE. - ISSN 1471-0358. - 6:2(2006), pp. 205-238. [10.1111/j.1471-0366.2006.00120.x]
What was left of the groundnut scheme: Development Disaster and Labour Market in Southern Tanganyika 1946-1952
Rizzo M
2006
Abstract
The East African Groundnut Scheme in Tanganyika is probably the most dramatic and most cited failure of the ambitions of British late colonial developmentalism. Issues of labour supply in the scheme’s short history, and the relationship of labour supply with the peasant economy of Province, have received almost no attention, a gap which this article aims to begin to fill. It suggests that the implementation of the scheme gave rise to a political battle over labour market control between the colonial state in Tanganyika and scheme managers. The paper documents how, without any support from the colonial administration, the scheme attempted to recruit the large numbers of workers it required, and its frustrations in doing so. It investigates the factors that prevented labour supply satisfying demand, how peasants in the area engaged with the labour market (and were able to adjust their participation in it), and the impact of labour market growth on the household farm economy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rizzo_What-was-left_2006.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
469.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
469.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


