This paper analyzes the response by NGOs to the 2008 World Development Report (WDR08). It does so at two levels of analysis, which in turn reflect two possible ways of reading the WDR08. The first is to read the WDR08 as a document for policy guidance on ‘agriculture for development’. In this respect the paper shows how NGOs expose and challenge the WDR08’s optimism for the benign impact of unregulated agribusiness investment on poverty reduction, and put forward a convincing alternative. The second, and politically more fertile, way of reading the WDR08 is to make sense of its numerous internal contradictions. These contradictions are functional to the World Bank’s hegemonic effort of establishing a common, and broader, agenda for rural development. Having highlighted the WDR08’s incoherent messages on (i) rural labour markets and their role in poverty reduction and (ii) what constitutes the most promising driver of poverty reduction in agriculture (returns from wage labour vs from own account farming), the paper documents NGOs’ failure to detect and politically exploit these contradictions.

The struggle for alternatives: NGOs' responses to the 2008 World Development Report / Rizzo, M. - In: JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE. - ISSN 1471-0358. - 9:2(2009), pp. 277-290. [10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00206.x]

The struggle for alternatives: NGOs' responses to the 2008 World Development Report

Rizzo M
2009

Abstract

This paper analyzes the response by NGOs to the 2008 World Development Report (WDR08). It does so at two levels of analysis, which in turn reflect two possible ways of reading the WDR08. The first is to read the WDR08 as a document for policy guidance on ‘agriculture for development’. In this respect the paper shows how NGOs expose and challenge the WDR08’s optimism for the benign impact of unregulated agribusiness investment on poverty reduction, and put forward a convincing alternative. The second, and politically more fertile, way of reading the WDR08 is to make sense of its numerous internal contradictions. These contradictions are functional to the World Bank’s hegemonic effort of establishing a common, and broader, agenda for rural development. Having highlighted the WDR08’s incoherent messages on (i) rural labour markets and their role in poverty reduction and (ii) what constitutes the most promising driver of poverty reduction in agriculture (returns from wage labour vs from own account farming), the paper documents NGOs’ failure to detect and politically exploit these contradictions.
2009
World Development Report 2008; NGOs; rural labour markets,; agriculture; hegemony; ActionAid; Oxfam
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The struggle for alternatives: NGOs' responses to the 2008 World Development Report / Rizzo, M. - In: JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE. - ISSN 1471-0358. - 9:2(2009), pp. 277-290. [10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00206.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Rizzo_The-Struggle-for-Alternatives_2009.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 108.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
108.27 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1741390
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact