The main goal of the EU GDPR is to protect personal data of individuals within the EU. This is expressed in several rights and, among them, in this work we focus on the Right to Erasure, more commonly known as the Right to Be Forgotten (RtBF). There is an intriguing debate about the affordable costs and the actual technical feasibility of satisfying the RtBF in digital platforms. We note that some digital platforms process personal data in order to derive and store correlated data raising two main issues: 1) removing personal data could create inconsistencies in the remaining correlated data; 2) correlated data could also be personal data. As such, in some cases, erasing personal data can trigger an avalanche on the remaining information stored in the platform. Addressing the above issues can be very challenging in particular when a digital platform has been originally built without embedding in its design specific methodologies to deal with the RtBF. This work aims at illustrating concrete scenarios where the RtBF is technically hard to guarantee with traditional techniques. On the positive side, we show how zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs can be leveraged to design affordable solutions in various use cases, especially when considered at design time. ZK proofs can be instrumental for compliance to the RtBF revolutionizing the current approaches to design compliant systems. Concretely, we show an assessment scheme allowing to check compliance with the RtBF leveraging the power of ZK proofs. We analyze the above assessment scheme considering specific hard-to-address use cases.
The Right to Be Zero-Knowledge Forgotten / Visconti, I.. - (2024), pp. 1-9. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security tenutosi a Vienna; Austria) [10.1145/3664476.3669973].
The Right to Be Zero-Knowledge Forgotten
Visconti I.
2024
Abstract
The main goal of the EU GDPR is to protect personal data of individuals within the EU. This is expressed in several rights and, among them, in this work we focus on the Right to Erasure, more commonly known as the Right to Be Forgotten (RtBF). There is an intriguing debate about the affordable costs and the actual technical feasibility of satisfying the RtBF in digital platforms. We note that some digital platforms process personal data in order to derive and store correlated data raising two main issues: 1) removing personal data could create inconsistencies in the remaining correlated data; 2) correlated data could also be personal data. As such, in some cases, erasing personal data can trigger an avalanche on the remaining information stored in the platform. Addressing the above issues can be very challenging in particular when a digital platform has been originally built without embedding in its design specific methodologies to deal with the RtBF. This work aims at illustrating concrete scenarios where the RtBF is technically hard to guarantee with traditional techniques. On the positive side, we show how zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs can be leveraged to design affordable solutions in various use cases, especially when considered at design time. ZK proofs can be instrumental for compliance to the RtBF revolutionizing the current approaches to design compliant systems. Concretely, we show an assessment scheme allowing to check compliance with the RtBF leveraging the power of ZK proofs. We analyze the above assessment scheme considering specific hard-to-address use cases.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Visconti_Right_2024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
674.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
674.51 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.