BackgroundTo compare surgical, pathological, and functional outcomes of patients undergoing NeuroSAFE-guided RARP vs. RARP alone.MethodsIn February 2024, a literature search and assessment was conducted through PubMed (R), Scopus (R), and Web of Science (TM), to retrieve data of men with PCa (P) undergoing RARP with NeuroSAFE (I) versus RARP without NeuroSAFE (C) to evaluate surgical, pathological, oncological, and functional outcomes (O), across retrospective and/or prospective comparative studies (Studies). Surgical (operative time [OT], number of nerve-sparing [NS] RARP, number of secondary resections after NeuroSAFE), pathological (PSM), oncological (biochemical recurrence [BCR]), and functional (postoperative continence and sexual function recovery) outcomes were analyzed, using weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables and odd ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables.ResultsOverall, seven studies met the inclusion criteria (one randomized clinical trial, one prospective non-randomized trial and five retrospective studies) and were eligible for SR and MA. A total of 4,207 patients were included in the MA, with 2247 patients (53%) undergoing RARP with the addition of NeuroSAFE, and 1 960 (47%) receiving RARP alone. The addition of NeuroSAFE enhanced the likelihood of receiving a nerve-sparing (NS) RARP (OR 5.49, 95% CI 2.48-12.12, I2 = 72%). In the NeuroSAFE cohort, a statistically significant reduction in the likelihood of PSM at final pathology (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.79, I2 = 73%) was observed. Similarly, a reduced likelihood of BCR favoring the NeuroSAFE was obtained (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.62, I2 = 0%). At 12-month postoperatively, NeuroSAFE led to a significantly higher likelihood of being pad-free (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.25-3.25, I2 = 0%), and of erectile function recovery (OR 3.50, 95% CI 2.34-5.23, I2 = 0%).ConclusionAvailable evidence suggests that NeuroSAFE might represent a histologically based approach to NVB preservation, broadening the indications of NS RARP, reducing the likelihood of PSM and subsequent BCR. In addition, it might translate into better functional postoperative outcomes. However, the current body of evidence is mostly derived from non-randomized studies with a high risk of bias.

Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies / Ditonno, Francesco; Bologna, Eugenio; Licari, Leslie Claire; Franco, Antonio; Cannoletta, Donato; Checcucci, Enrico; Veccia, Alessandro; Bertolo, Riccardo; Crivellaro, Simone; Porpiglia, Francesco; De Nunzio, Cosimo; Antonelli, Alessandro; Autorino, Riccardo. - In: PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES. - ISSN 1365-7852. - (2024). [10.1038/s41391-024-00891-3]

Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Ditonno, Francesco;Bologna, Eugenio;Licari, Leslie Claire;Franco, Antonio;De Nunzio, Cosimo;Antonelli, Alessandro;
2024

Abstract

BackgroundTo compare surgical, pathological, and functional outcomes of patients undergoing NeuroSAFE-guided RARP vs. RARP alone.MethodsIn February 2024, a literature search and assessment was conducted through PubMed (R), Scopus (R), and Web of Science (TM), to retrieve data of men with PCa (P) undergoing RARP with NeuroSAFE (I) versus RARP without NeuroSAFE (C) to evaluate surgical, pathological, oncological, and functional outcomes (O), across retrospective and/or prospective comparative studies (Studies). Surgical (operative time [OT], number of nerve-sparing [NS] RARP, number of secondary resections after NeuroSAFE), pathological (PSM), oncological (biochemical recurrence [BCR]), and functional (postoperative continence and sexual function recovery) outcomes were analyzed, using weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables and odd ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables.ResultsOverall, seven studies met the inclusion criteria (one randomized clinical trial, one prospective non-randomized trial and five retrospective studies) and were eligible for SR and MA. A total of 4,207 patients were included in the MA, with 2247 patients (53%) undergoing RARP with the addition of NeuroSAFE, and 1 960 (47%) receiving RARP alone. The addition of NeuroSAFE enhanced the likelihood of receiving a nerve-sparing (NS) RARP (OR 5.49, 95% CI 2.48-12.12, I2 = 72%). In the NeuroSAFE cohort, a statistically significant reduction in the likelihood of PSM at final pathology (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.79, I2 = 73%) was observed. Similarly, a reduced likelihood of BCR favoring the NeuroSAFE was obtained (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.62, I2 = 0%). At 12-month postoperatively, NeuroSAFE led to a significantly higher likelihood of being pad-free (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.25-3.25, I2 = 0%), and of erectile function recovery (OR 3.50, 95% CI 2.34-5.23, I2 = 0%).ConclusionAvailable evidence suggests that NeuroSAFE might represent a histologically based approach to NVB preservation, broadening the indications of NS RARP, reducing the likelihood of PSM and subsequent BCR. In addition, it might translate into better functional postoperative outcomes. However, the current body of evidence is mostly derived from non-randomized studies with a high risk of bias.
2024
robotic; prostate cancer; neurosafe
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies / Ditonno, Francesco; Bologna, Eugenio; Licari, Leslie Claire; Franco, Antonio; Cannoletta, Donato; Checcucci, Enrico; Veccia, Alessandro; Bertolo, Riccardo; Crivellaro, Simone; Porpiglia, Francesco; De Nunzio, Cosimo; Antonelli, Alessandro; Autorino, Riccardo. - In: PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES. - ISSN 1365-7852. - (2024). [10.1038/s41391-024-00891-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ditonno_Neurovascular-structure-adjacent_2024.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1721324
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact