The study aims to empirically assess the control-mastery theory hypothesis that considers chronic couple conflictuality as the repetition of relational vicious circles—that is, interactions where both partners test their pathogenic beliefs and fail their reciprocal tests, confirming their reciprocal pathogenic beliefs. In addition, the study aims to verify if interpersonal guilt is more activated during couple conflicts. Our study involved 11 couples treated by four experienced therapists and nine trained, independent judges who, after reading verbatim transcripts of the couples’ psychotherapy sessions, used the Patient Scale of Couple Testing (PSCT), and the Patient Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale (PIGRS) to rate segments of couple sessions. The results were obtained by applying generalized estimating equations and confirm our hypotheses: we could observe a greater presence of testing activity and confirmation of pathogenic beliefs in segments classified as conflictual for both partners and a stronger presence of interpersonal guilt in conflictual versus nonconflictual interactions. These findings support the idea that conflict interactions can be seen as failed attempts by both partners to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs.

Vicious Relational Circles and Chronic Couple Conflictuality: An Empirical Study / Fiorenza, Eleonora; Crisafulli, Valeria; Carpentieri, Renato; DE LUCA, Emma; DI FILIPPO, Clarissa; Michela La Stella, ; Leonardi, Jessica; Mannocchi, Camilla; Rodomonti, Martina; Rosi, Laura; Santodoro, Marianna; Gazzillo, Francesco. - In: JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0022-0116. - (2023). [10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5]

Vicious Relational Circles and Chronic Couple Conflictuality: An Empirical Study

Fiorenza Eleonora
Primo
;
Crisafulli Valeria;Carpentieri Renato;Emma De Luca;Clarissa Di Filippo;Leonardi Jessica;Mannocchi Camilla;Rodomonti Martina;Rosi Laura;Santodoro Marianna;Gazzillo Francesco
Ultimo
2023

Abstract

The study aims to empirically assess the control-mastery theory hypothesis that considers chronic couple conflictuality as the repetition of relational vicious circles—that is, interactions where both partners test their pathogenic beliefs and fail their reciprocal tests, confirming their reciprocal pathogenic beliefs. In addition, the study aims to verify if interpersonal guilt is more activated during couple conflicts. Our study involved 11 couples treated by four experienced therapists and nine trained, independent judges who, after reading verbatim transcripts of the couples’ psychotherapy sessions, used the Patient Scale of Couple Testing (PSCT), and the Patient Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale (PIGRS) to rate segments of couple sessions. The results were obtained by applying generalized estimating equations and confirm our hypotheses: we could observe a greater presence of testing activity and confirmation of pathogenic beliefs in segments classified as conflictual for both partners and a stronger presence of interpersonal guilt in conflictual versus nonconflictual interactions. These findings support the idea that conflict interactions can be seen as failed attempts by both partners to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs.
2023
Chronic couple conflictuality · Control-mastery theory · Couples therapy · Vicious relational circles
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Vicious Relational Circles and Chronic Couple Conflictuality: An Empirical Study / Fiorenza, Eleonora; Crisafulli, Valeria; Carpentieri, Renato; DE LUCA, Emma; DI FILIPPO, Clarissa; Michela La Stella, ; Leonardi, Jessica; Mannocchi, Camilla; Rodomonti, Martina; Rosi, Laura; Santodoro, Marianna; Gazzillo, Francesco. - In: JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0022-0116. - (2023). [10.1007/s10879-023-09607-5]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1692206
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact