We study sequential bilateral trade where sellers and buyers valuations are completely arbitrary ({\sl i.e.}, determined by an adversary). Sellers and buyers are strategic agents with private valuations for the good and the goal is to design a mechanism that maximizes efficiency (or gain from trade) while being incentive compatible, individually rational and budget balanced. In this paper we consider gain from trade which is harder to approximate than social welfare.We consider a variety of feedback scenarios and distinguish the cases where the mechanism posts one price and when it can post different prices for buyer and seller. We show several surprising results about the separation between the different scenarios. In particular we show that (a) it is impossible to achieve sublinear α-regret for any α<2, (b) but with full feedback sublinear 2-regret is achievable (c) with a single price and partial feedback one cannot get sublinear α-regret for any constant α (d) nevertheless, posting two prices even with one-bit feedback achieves sublinear 2-regret, and (e) there is a provable separation in the 2-regret bounds between full and partial feedback.

An α-regret analysis of Adversarial Bilateral Trade / Azar, Y.; Fiat, A.; Fusco, F.. - 35:(2022). (Intervento presentato al convegno Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (was NIPS) tenutosi a New Orleans; USA).

An α-regret analysis of Adversarial Bilateral Trade

Fusco F.
2022

Abstract

We study sequential bilateral trade where sellers and buyers valuations are completely arbitrary ({\sl i.e.}, determined by an adversary). Sellers and buyers are strategic agents with private valuations for the good and the goal is to design a mechanism that maximizes efficiency (or gain from trade) while being incentive compatible, individually rational and budget balanced. In this paper we consider gain from trade which is harder to approximate than social welfare.We consider a variety of feedback scenarios and distinguish the cases where the mechanism posts one price and when it can post different prices for buyer and seller. We show several surprising results about the separation between the different scenarios. In particular we show that (a) it is impossible to achieve sublinear α-regret for any α<2, (b) but with full feedback sublinear 2-regret is achievable (c) with a single price and partial feedback one cannot get sublinear α-regret for any constant α (d) nevertheless, posting two prices even with one-bit feedback achieves sublinear 2-regret, and (e) there is a provable separation in the 2-regret bounds between full and partial feedback.
2022
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (was NIPS)
bilateral trade; online learning; partial feedback
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
An α-regret analysis of Adversarial Bilateral Trade / Azar, Y.; Fiat, A.; Fusco, F.. - 35:(2022). (Intervento presentato al convegno Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (was NIPS) tenutosi a New Orleans; USA).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Azar_An_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/0b2832072ff6df19e586c74e27d90f12-Paper-Conference.pdf
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 175.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
175.22 kB Adobe PDF
Azar_preprint_An_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/0b2832072ff6df19e586c74e27d90f12-Paper-Conference.pdf
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 570.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
570.53 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1684841
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact