With its judgment no. 131/2022, the Italian Constitutional Court has put an end (at least so it is hoped) to the "saga"; concerning the discipline relating to the attribution of surnames to children. For several years the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and that of the European Court of Human Rights had alternated in affirming that the Italian legal system, in particular the rule that imposed the automatic attribution of the paternal surname, was in contrast with, respectively, the Constitution and the ECHR. Given the persistent inaction of the Italian legislator in following up on these requests, the Constitutional Court has now broken the delay by indicating itself the solutions to eliminate the aforementioned conflict. In doing so, the Court "reformed" the entire discipline, establishing both the general rule and its exception: the first consists in the attribution to the child of a double surname consisting of the surnames of both parents; the second is represented by the faculty to transmit only the paternal surname or only the maternal surname, and this only if so is the common will of both parents. As for the general rule, the Court has also specified the methods by which to arrange the order of succession of the parents' surnames in the formation of the double surname. This comment highlights how, in its reasoning, the Constitutional Court has systematically aligned itself with the anticipatory judgments of the Strasbourg Court. Furthermore, the ECHR - in particular its articles 8 and 14 - proves to be the only parameter of legitimacy referred to by the Court with reference to the "international obligations" mentioned in art. 117, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. This approach appears reductive, especially if we consider that the Convention on the elimination of discrimination against women (CEDAW) contains a specific relevant provision, that of art. 16, par. 1, letter g), which could have finally (and deservedly) received a concrete application.

Trasmissione del cognome ai figli e dialogo fra corti: la sentenza n. 131/2022 della corte costituzionale / Fabbricotti, A.. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - 3:16(2022), pp. 675-681. [10.12829/106192]

Trasmissione del cognome ai figli e dialogo fra corti: la sentenza n. 131/2022 della corte costituzionale

A. Fabbricotti
2022

Abstract

With its judgment no. 131/2022, the Italian Constitutional Court has put an end (at least so it is hoped) to the "saga"; concerning the discipline relating to the attribution of surnames to children. For several years the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and that of the European Court of Human Rights had alternated in affirming that the Italian legal system, in particular the rule that imposed the automatic attribution of the paternal surname, was in contrast with, respectively, the Constitution and the ECHR. Given the persistent inaction of the Italian legislator in following up on these requests, the Constitutional Court has now broken the delay by indicating itself the solutions to eliminate the aforementioned conflict. In doing so, the Court "reformed" the entire discipline, establishing both the general rule and its exception: the first consists in the attribution to the child of a double surname consisting of the surnames of both parents; the second is represented by the faculty to transmit only the paternal surname or only the maternal surname, and this only if so is the common will of both parents. As for the general rule, the Court has also specified the methods by which to arrange the order of succession of the parents' surnames in the formation of the double surname. This comment highlights how, in its reasoning, the Constitutional Court has systematically aligned itself with the anticipatory judgments of the Strasbourg Court. Furthermore, the ECHR - in particular its articles 8 and 14 - proves to be the only parameter of legitimacy referred to by the Court with reference to the "international obligations" mentioned in art. 117, paragraph 1 of the Constitution. This approach appears reductive, especially if we consider that the Convention on the elimination of discrimination against women (CEDAW) contains a specific relevant provision, that of art. 16, par. 1, letter g), which could have finally (and deservedly) received a concrete application.
2022
eguaglianza di genere; diritto all'identità personale; principio di non discriminazione; cedaw; cedu; dialogo tra corti
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Trasmissione del cognome ai figli e dialogo fra corti: la sentenza n. 131/2022 della corte costituzionale / Fabbricotti, A.. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - 3:16(2022), pp. 675-681. [10.12829/106192]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Fabbricotti_Trasmissione_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Testo dell'articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 249.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
249.51 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore
Fabbricotti_Trasmissione_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 526.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
526.31 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1665761
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact