Many bioinformatics methods have been proposed for reducing the complexity of large gene or protein networks into relevant subnetworks or modules. Yet, how such methods compare to each other in terms of their ability to identify disease-relevant modules in different types of network remains poorly understood. We launched the 'Disease Module Identification DREAM Challenge', an open competition to comprehensively assess module identification methods across diverse protein-protein interaction, signaling, gene co-expression, homology and cancer-gene networks. Predicted network modules were tested for association with complex traits and diseases using a unique collection of 180 genome-wide association studies. Our robust assessment of 75 module identification methods reveals top-performing algorithms, which recover complementary trait-associated modules. We find that most of these modules correspond to core disease-relevant pathways, which often comprise therapeutic targets. This community challenge establishes biologically interpretable benchmarks, tools and guidelines for molecular network analysis to study human disease biology.

Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases / Choobdar, S; Ahsen, Me; Crawford, J; Tomasoni, M; Fang, T; Lamparter, D; Lin, Jy; Hescott, B; Hu, Xz; Mercer, J; Natoli, T; Narayan, R; Aicheler, F; Amoroso, N; Arenas, A; Azhagesan, K; Baker, A; Banf, M; Batzoglou, S; Baudot, A; Bellotti, R; Bergmann, S; Boroevich, Ka; Brun, C; Cai, S; Caldera, M; Calderone, A; Cesareni, G; Chen, Wq; Chichester, C; Cowen, L; Cui, Hz; Dao, P; De Domenico, M; Dhroso, A; Didier, G; Divine, M; del Sol, A; Feng, Xy; Flores-Canales, Jc; Fortunato, S; Gitter, A; Gorska, A; Guan, Yf; Guenoche, A; Gomez, S; Hamza, H; Hartmann, A; He, S; Heijs, A; Heinrich, J; Hu, Y; Huang, Xq; Hughitt, Vk; Jeon, M; Jeub, L; Johnson, Nt; Joo, K; Joung, I; Jung, S; Kalko, Sg; Kamola, Pj; Kang, J; Kaveelerdpotjana, B; Kim, M; Kim, Ya; Kohlbacher, O; Korkin, D; Krzysztof, K; Kunji, K; Kutalik, Z; Lage, K; Lang-Brown, S; Le, Td; Lee, J; Lee, S; Lee, J; Li, D; Li, Jy; Liu, L; Loizou, A; Luo, Zh; Lysenko, A; Ma, Tl; Mall, R; Marbach, D; Mattia, T; Medvedovic, M; Menche, J; Micarelli, E; Monaco, A; Mueller, F; Narykov, O; Norman, T; Park, S; Perfetto, L; Perrin, D; Pirro, S; Przytycka, Tm; Qian, Xn; Raman, K; Ramazzotti, D; Ramsahai, E; Ravindran, B; Rennert, P; Saez-Rodriguez, J; Scharfe, C; Sharan, R; Shi, N; Shin, W; Shu, H; Sinha, H; Slonim, Dk; Spinelli, L; Srinivasan, S; Subramanian, A; Suver, C; Szklarczyk, D; Tangaro, S; Thiagarajan, S; Tichit, L; Tiede, T; Tripathi, B; Tsherniak, A; Tsunoda, T; Turei, D; Ullah, E; Vahedi, G; Valdeolivas, A; Vivek, J; von Mering, C; Waagmeester, A; Wang, B; Wang, Yj; Weir, Ba; White, S; Winkler, S; Xu, K; Xu, Ts; Yan, Ch; Yang, Lq; Yu, Kx; Yu, Xt; Zaffaroni, G; Zaslavskiy, M; Zeng, T; Zhang, Jtd; Zhang, L; Zhang, Wj; Zhang, L; Zhang, Xy; Zhang, Jp; Zhou, X; Zhou, Jr; Zhu, Ht; Zhu, Jj; Zuccon, G; Stolovitzky, G; Kutalik, Z; Lage, K; Slonim, Dk; Saez-Rodriguez, J; Cowen, Lj; Bergmann, S; Marbach, D. - In: NATURE METHODS. - ISSN 1548-7091. - 16:9(2019), pp. 843-852. [10.1038/s41592-019-0509-5]

Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases

Perfetto L;
2019

Abstract

Many bioinformatics methods have been proposed for reducing the complexity of large gene or protein networks into relevant subnetworks or modules. Yet, how such methods compare to each other in terms of their ability to identify disease-relevant modules in different types of network remains poorly understood. We launched the 'Disease Module Identification DREAM Challenge', an open competition to comprehensively assess module identification methods across diverse protein-protein interaction, signaling, gene co-expression, homology and cancer-gene networks. Predicted network modules were tested for association with complex traits and diseases using a unique collection of 180 genome-wide association studies. Our robust assessment of 75 module identification methods reveals top-performing algorithms, which recover complementary trait-associated modules. We find that most of these modules correspond to core disease-relevant pathways, which often comprise therapeutic targets. This community challenge establishes biologically interpretable benchmarks, tools and guidelines for molecular network analysis to study human disease biology.
2019
DREAM challenge; network; modules; predictions
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases / Choobdar, S; Ahsen, Me; Crawford, J; Tomasoni, M; Fang, T; Lamparter, D; Lin, Jy; Hescott, B; Hu, Xz; Mercer, J; Natoli, T; Narayan, R; Aicheler, F; Amoroso, N; Arenas, A; Azhagesan, K; Baker, A; Banf, M; Batzoglou, S; Baudot, A; Bellotti, R; Bergmann, S; Boroevich, Ka; Brun, C; Cai, S; Caldera, M; Calderone, A; Cesareni, G; Chen, Wq; Chichester, C; Cowen, L; Cui, Hz; Dao, P; De Domenico, M; Dhroso, A; Didier, G; Divine, M; del Sol, A; Feng, Xy; Flores-Canales, Jc; Fortunato, S; Gitter, A; Gorska, A; Guan, Yf; Guenoche, A; Gomez, S; Hamza, H; Hartmann, A; He, S; Heijs, A; Heinrich, J; Hu, Y; Huang, Xq; Hughitt, Vk; Jeon, M; Jeub, L; Johnson, Nt; Joo, K; Joung, I; Jung, S; Kalko, Sg; Kamola, Pj; Kang, J; Kaveelerdpotjana, B; Kim, M; Kim, Ya; Kohlbacher, O; Korkin, D; Krzysztof, K; Kunji, K; Kutalik, Z; Lage, K; Lang-Brown, S; Le, Td; Lee, J; Lee, S; Lee, J; Li, D; Li, Jy; Liu, L; Loizou, A; Luo, Zh; Lysenko, A; Ma, Tl; Mall, R; Marbach, D; Mattia, T; Medvedovic, M; Menche, J; Micarelli, E; Monaco, A; Mueller, F; Narykov, O; Norman, T; Park, S; Perfetto, L; Perrin, D; Pirro, S; Przytycka, Tm; Qian, Xn; Raman, K; Ramazzotti, D; Ramsahai, E; Ravindran, B; Rennert, P; Saez-Rodriguez, J; Scharfe, C; Sharan, R; Shi, N; Shin, W; Shu, H; Sinha, H; Slonim, Dk; Spinelli, L; Srinivasan, S; Subramanian, A; Suver, C; Szklarczyk, D; Tangaro, S; Thiagarajan, S; Tichit, L; Tiede, T; Tripathi, B; Tsherniak, A; Tsunoda, T; Turei, D; Ullah, E; Vahedi, G; Valdeolivas, A; Vivek, J; von Mering, C; Waagmeester, A; Wang, B; Wang, Yj; Weir, Ba; White, S; Winkler, S; Xu, K; Xu, Ts; Yan, Ch; Yang, Lq; Yu, Kx; Yu, Xt; Zaffaroni, G; Zaslavskiy, M; Zeng, T; Zhang, Jtd; Zhang, L; Zhang, Wj; Zhang, L; Zhang, Xy; Zhang, Jp; Zhou, X; Zhou, Jr; Zhu, Ht; Zhu, Jj; Zuccon, G; Stolovitzky, G; Kutalik, Z; Lage, K; Slonim, Dk; Saez-Rodriguez, J; Cowen, Lj; Bergmann, S; Marbach, D. - In: NATURE METHODS. - ISSN 1548-7091. - 16:9(2019), pp. 843-852. [10.1038/s41592-019-0509-5]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Choobdar_Assessment_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.72 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.72 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1660164
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 152
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 141
social impact