BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the main indications for urgent surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has shown advantages in terms of clinical results and cost-effectiveness, even if there is still controversy about different devices to utilize, especially with regards to the endoloop (EL) vs endostapler (ES) when it comes to stump closure. AIM:To compare safety and cost-effectiveness of EL vs ES. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, data of 996 consecutive patients treated by LA with a 3 years-follow up in the department of Emergency General Surgery - St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna (Italy) were retrieved. A meta-analysis was performed in terms of surgical complications, in comparison to the international literature published from 1995 to 2021. RESULTS:The meta-analysis showed no evidence regarding wound infections, abdominal abscesses, and total post-operative complications, in terms of superiority of a surgical technique for the stump closure in LA. CONCLUSION: Even when AA is complicated, the routine use of EL is safe in most patients.
Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops. A meta-analysis / Zorzetti, Noemi; Lauro, Augusto; Bellini, Maria Irene; Vaccari, Samuele; Dalla Via, Barbara; Cervellera, Maurizio; Cirocchi, Roberto; Sorrenti, Salvatore; D’Andrea, Vito; Tonini, Valeria. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1948-9366. - 14:9(2022), pp. 1060-1071. [10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060]
Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops. A meta-analysis
Zorzetti, NoemiPrimo
;Lauro, AugustoSecondo
;Bellini, Maria Irene
;Vaccari, Samuele;Sorrenti, Salvatore;D’Andrea, VitoPenultimo
;
2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the main indications for urgent surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has shown advantages in terms of clinical results and cost-effectiveness, even if there is still controversy about different devices to utilize, especially with regards to the endoloop (EL) vs endostapler (ES) when it comes to stump closure. AIM:To compare safety and cost-effectiveness of EL vs ES. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, data of 996 consecutive patients treated by LA with a 3 years-follow up in the department of Emergency General Surgery - St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna (Italy) were retrieved. A meta-analysis was performed in terms of surgical complications, in comparison to the international literature published from 1995 to 2021. RESULTS:The meta-analysis showed no evidence regarding wound infections, abdominal abscesses, and total post-operative complications, in terms of superiority of a surgical technique for the stump closure in LA. CONCLUSION: Even when AA is complicated, the routine use of EL is safe in most patients.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Zorzetti_Laparoscopic-appendectomy_2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
706.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
706.34 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.