BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the main indications for urgent surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has shown advantages in terms of clinical results and cost-effectiveness, even if there is still controversy about different devices to utilize, especially with regards to the endoloop (EL) vs endostapler (ES) when it comes to stump closure. AIM:To compare safety and cost-effectiveness of EL vs ES. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, data of 996 consecutive patients treated by LA with a 3 years-follow up in the department of Emergency General Surgery - St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna (Italy) were retrieved. A meta-analysis was performed in terms of surgical complications, in comparison to the international literature published from 1995 to 2021. RESULTS:The meta-analysis showed no evidence regarding wound infections, abdominal abscesses, and total post-operative complications, in terms of superiority of a surgical technique for the stump closure in LA. CONCLUSION: Even when AA is complicated, the routine use of EL is safe in most patients.

Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops. A meta-analysis / Zorzetti, Noemi; Lauro, Augusto; Bellini, Maria Irene; Vaccari, Samuele; Dalla Via, Barbara; Cervellera, Maurizio; Cirocchi, Roberto; Sorrenti, Salvatore; D’Andrea, Vito; Tonini, Valeria. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1948-9366. - 14:9(2022), pp. 1060-1071. [10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060]

Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops. A meta-analysis

Zorzetti, Noemi
Primo
;
Lauro, Augusto
Secondo
;
Bellini, Maria Irene
;
Vaccari, Samuele;Sorrenti, Salvatore;D’Andrea, Vito
Penultimo
;
2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the main indications for urgent surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has shown advantages in terms of clinical results and cost-effectiveness, even if there is still controversy about different devices to utilize, especially with regards to the endoloop (EL) vs endostapler (ES) when it comes to stump closure. AIM:To compare safety and cost-effectiveness of EL vs ES. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, data of 996 consecutive patients treated by LA with a 3 years-follow up in the department of Emergency General Surgery - St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna (Italy) were retrieved. A meta-analysis was performed in terms of surgical complications, in comparison to the international literature published from 1995 to 2021. RESULTS:The meta-analysis showed no evidence regarding wound infections, abdominal abscesses, and total post-operative complications, in terms of superiority of a surgical technique for the stump closure in LA. CONCLUSION: Even when AA is complicated, the routine use of EL is safe in most patients.
2022
acute appendicitis; laparoscopic appendectomy; endoloops; stapler; post-operative complications
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops. A meta-analysis / Zorzetti, Noemi; Lauro, Augusto; Bellini, Maria Irene; Vaccari, Samuele; Dalla Via, Barbara; Cervellera, Maurizio; Cirocchi, Roberto; Sorrenti, Salvatore; D’Andrea, Vito; Tonini, Valeria. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1948-9366. - 14:9(2022), pp. 1060-1071. [10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Zorzetti_Laparoscopic-appendectomy_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 706.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
706.34 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1655017
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact