A formation mission scenario is considered, consisting of small satellites (Chasers) that must acquire and maintain a reference trajectory with respect to a larger and non-cooperating Target satellite. The Chaser must perform its formation guidance and control tasks within the framework of its thruster constraints: the case of a low thrust electrical engine is here considered. The constraints of such a thruster are relevant to: (a) single-axis orientation of the thrust (since only one engine is present); (b) the thrust level (only two levels are possible: maximum and zero); (c) maximum ON time (due to power consumption and temperature issues); (d) minimum ON time (because of the time required to prepare the motor ignition, it is preferrable not to have very short ignitions); (e) maximum number of ignitions; (f) minimum time between two subsequent ignitions. The control algorithm developed to satisfy all these constraints is a model predictive control based on a mixed-Integer genetic algorithm optimization, which provides a fast estimate of the necessary scheduled actions. The algorithm takes J2 and drag perturbations into account; at the scope a differential orbital parameters linear relative dynamics model has been used, while the real-world dynamics is represented by a high precision orbital propagator. The developed orbital controller is particularly effective when trajectory keeping is required, while a different (not optimal) controller is used when large reconfigurations are needed. Developing a guidance logic that opportunely switches between the two controllers, the results show that even such a multi-constrained control system can perform a wide range of typical formation operations, such as station keeping in normal mode and during Target's scheduled operations, and acquisition of different relative configurations, like Helix or Train formations.
Mixed-Integer GA optimization for the control of a formation of small satellites equipped with multi-constrained electric thrusters / Sabatini, M.; Palmerini, G. B.. - C1:(2021), pp. 1-13. (Intervento presentato al convegno IAF Astrodynamics Symposium 2021 at the 72nd International Astronautical Congress, IAC 2021 tenutosi a Dubai(UAE)).
Mixed-Integer GA optimization for the control of a formation of small satellites equipped with multi-constrained electric thrusters
Sabatini M.
;Palmerini G. B.
2021
Abstract
A formation mission scenario is considered, consisting of small satellites (Chasers) that must acquire and maintain a reference trajectory with respect to a larger and non-cooperating Target satellite. The Chaser must perform its formation guidance and control tasks within the framework of its thruster constraints: the case of a low thrust electrical engine is here considered. The constraints of such a thruster are relevant to: (a) single-axis orientation of the thrust (since only one engine is present); (b) the thrust level (only two levels are possible: maximum and zero); (c) maximum ON time (due to power consumption and temperature issues); (d) minimum ON time (because of the time required to prepare the motor ignition, it is preferrable not to have very short ignitions); (e) maximum number of ignitions; (f) minimum time between two subsequent ignitions. The control algorithm developed to satisfy all these constraints is a model predictive control based on a mixed-Integer genetic algorithm optimization, which provides a fast estimate of the necessary scheduled actions. The algorithm takes J2 and drag perturbations into account; at the scope a differential orbital parameters linear relative dynamics model has been used, while the real-world dynamics is represented by a high precision orbital propagator. The developed orbital controller is particularly effective when trajectory keeping is required, while a different (not optimal) controller is used when large reconfigurations are needed. Developing a guidance logic that opportunely switches between the two controllers, the results show that even such a multi-constrained control system can perform a wide range of typical formation operations, such as station keeping in normal mode and during Target's scheduled operations, and acquisition of different relative configurations, like Helix or Train formations.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Sabatin_Mixed-Integer_2021.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Note: https://iafastro.directory/iac/paper/id/65593/summary/
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.29 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.