Objective To evaluate the time for recovery of the sense of smell in patients with CRSwNP who underwent Reboot surgery compared to patients undergoing ESS in a long-term follow-up study. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from 168 patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP, who underwent revision surgery, either as Extended Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (Reboot, 140 patients) or as regular Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS, 28 patients) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, aiming to compare the outcome of surgeries after 2 years of follow-up. Sense of smell was scored as judged by the patient using scores 0 to 3 reflecting a percentage estimate of remaining smell. Results Smell improved similarly in the Reboot and ESS groups over the first 9 months, which was maintained over 24 months in the Reboot, but not the ESS group (p = 0.007 after 18 months, p = 0.001 after 24 months). Furthermore, polyp recurrence rates were significantly lower in the Reboot group. Conclusion Reboot surgery significantly improved olfactory function and significantly reduced nasal polyp recurrence rates over 2 years post-operatively. Therefore, Reboot should be considered for patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, specifically when ESS failed, to offer long-term smell and a polyp-free status.

Reboot surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: recurrence and smell kinetics / Gomes, Sara Costa; Cavaliere, Carlo; Masieri, Simonetta; Van Zele, Thibaut; Gevaert, Philippe; Holtappels, Gabriele; Zhang, Nan; Ramasamy, Pathmanaban; Voegels, Richard Louis; Bachert, Claus. - In: EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY. - ISSN 0937-4477. - (2022). [10.1007/s00405-022-07470-z]

Reboot surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: recurrence and smell kinetics

Cavaliere, Carlo
Secondo
;
Masieri, Simonetta;
2022

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the time for recovery of the sense of smell in patients with CRSwNP who underwent Reboot surgery compared to patients undergoing ESS in a long-term follow-up study. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from 168 patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP, who underwent revision surgery, either as Extended Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (Reboot, 140 patients) or as regular Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS, 28 patients) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, aiming to compare the outcome of surgeries after 2 years of follow-up. Sense of smell was scored as judged by the patient using scores 0 to 3 reflecting a percentage estimate of remaining smell. Results Smell improved similarly in the Reboot and ESS groups over the first 9 months, which was maintained over 24 months in the Reboot, but not the ESS group (p = 0.007 after 18 months, p = 0.001 after 24 months). Furthermore, polyp recurrence rates were significantly lower in the Reboot group. Conclusion Reboot surgery significantly improved olfactory function and significantly reduced nasal polyp recurrence rates over 2 years post-operatively. Therefore, Reboot should be considered for patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, specifically when ESS failed, to offer long-term smell and a polyp-free status.
2022
nasal polyps; nasal surgical procedures; olfaction disorders; sinusitis; smell
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Reboot surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: recurrence and smell kinetics / Gomes, Sara Costa; Cavaliere, Carlo; Masieri, Simonetta; Van Zele, Thibaut; Gevaert, Philippe; Holtappels, Gabriele; Zhang, Nan; Ramasamy, Pathmanaban; Voegels, Richard Louis; Bachert, Claus. - In: EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY. - ISSN 0937-4477. - (2022). [10.1007/s00405-022-07470-z]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Gomes_Reboot surgery_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 862.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
862.56 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1640368
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact