INTRODUCTION: A fter traumatic brain injury (TBI), cognitive, behavioral alterations and seizures frequently occur. Beside instrumental examinations, neuropsychological testing is the common clinical practice for detecting cognitive deficits. However, in highly skilled individuals, subtle changes with a large impact on fitness to fly may be neglected. CASE REPORT: A 28-yr-old Italian Air Force pilot with almost 700 flying hours suffered a TBI. After 2 yr of cognitive retraining programs, as the neuropsychological evaluation executed in a public hospital was within the standards and repeated EEGs had all been normal, the pilot was allowed to resume flying duties. During the refresh flight training, he was not considered proficient for solo flight and was again referred to the Institute of Aerospace Medicine (IMAS), where, due to the absence of a neuropsychologist, the pilot was referred to a public hospital. Again, he was within the normal range and received a fitness to fly with limitations. Nevertheless, the flight instructors noticed the presence of cyclic errors. Consequently, he was sent for a third time to the IMAS, where the cooperation between a neuropsychologist and a flight surgeon allowed a tailored testing. DISCUSSION: With a proper evaluation, the subject showed deficits in topographic visuospatial learning and in prospective memory. After 5 yr, he was finally declared permanently unfit to fly. Specific neuropsychological batteries, simulated flight tests, and aeromedical evaluations are described here.

A controversial assessment of fitness to fly after a traumatic brain injury / Verde, Paola; Giulio Guadagno, Anton; D’Angelo, Angelica; Vitalone, Roberto; DI VITA, Antonella; Piccardi, Laura. - In: AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE. - ISSN 2375-6314. - 93:2(2022), pp. 116-122. [10.3357/AMHP.5978.2022]

A controversial assessment of fitness to fly after a traumatic brain injury

Antonella Di Vita;Laura Piccardi
2022

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A fter traumatic brain injury (TBI), cognitive, behavioral alterations and seizures frequently occur. Beside instrumental examinations, neuropsychological testing is the common clinical practice for detecting cognitive deficits. However, in highly skilled individuals, subtle changes with a large impact on fitness to fly may be neglected. CASE REPORT: A 28-yr-old Italian Air Force pilot with almost 700 flying hours suffered a TBI. After 2 yr of cognitive retraining programs, as the neuropsychological evaluation executed in a public hospital was within the standards and repeated EEGs had all been normal, the pilot was allowed to resume flying duties. During the refresh flight training, he was not considered proficient for solo flight and was again referred to the Institute of Aerospace Medicine (IMAS), where, due to the absence of a neuropsychologist, the pilot was referred to a public hospital. Again, he was within the normal range and received a fitness to fly with limitations. Nevertheless, the flight instructors noticed the presence of cyclic errors. Consequently, he was sent for a third time to the IMAS, where the cooperation between a neuropsychologist and a flight surgeon allowed a tailored testing. DISCUSSION: With a proper evaluation, the subject showed deficits in topographic visuospatial learning and in prospective memory. After 5 yr, he was finally declared permanently unfit to fly. Specific neuropsychological batteries, simulated flight tests, and aeromedical evaluations are described here.
2022
head trauma; topographic memory; prospective memory; long-term memory; flight training; visuospatial learning; medical flight simulator test
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01i Case report
A controversial assessment of fitness to fly after a traumatic brain injury / Verde, Paola; Giulio Guadagno, Anton; D’Angelo, Angelica; Vitalone, Roberto; DI VITA, Antonella; Piccardi, Laura. - In: AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE. - ISSN 2375-6314. - 93:2(2022), pp. 116-122. [10.3357/AMHP.5978.2022]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Verde_Controversial-assessment_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 139.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
139.26 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1605536
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact