In the framework of geosite management, specific targeted symbols for geomorphological legends are still lacking. Concerning geosites of geomorphological interest, geomorphological mapping requires targeted symbols in relation to goals and applications, either concerning geomorphic hazards and risk detection or the enhancement of resources, in particular those related to cultural heritage and, hence, geoheritage. A new methodology for mapping geo(morpho)heritage on geo-morphological maps is presented in this paper. Nine iconic examples from the Italian landscape, selected in different morphogenetic and morphoclimatic contexts, are proposed to test the methodology in relation to point, polyline and polygon features. Moreover, guidelines for mapping are suggested according to the importance of the site and to the complexity of processes characterizing each case study.
Advances in geoheritage mapping. Application to iconic geomorphological examples from the Italian landscape / Coratza, P.; Bollati, I. M.; Panizza, V.; Brandolini, P.; Castaldini, D.; Cucchi, F.; Deiana, G.; Del Monte, M.; Faccini, F.; Finocchiaro, F.; Gioia, D.; Melis, R.; Minopoli, C.; Nesci, O.; Paliaga, G.; Pennetta, M.; Perotti, L.; Pica, A.; Tognetto, F.; Trocciola, A.; Valentini, L.; Giardino, M.; Pelfini, M.. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 13:20(2021). [10.3390/su132011538]
Advances in geoheritage mapping. Application to iconic geomorphological examples from the Italian landscape
Del Monte M.;Pica A.;
2021
Abstract
In the framework of geosite management, specific targeted symbols for geomorphological legends are still lacking. Concerning geosites of geomorphological interest, geomorphological mapping requires targeted symbols in relation to goals and applications, either concerning geomorphic hazards and risk detection or the enhancement of resources, in particular those related to cultural heritage and, hence, geoheritage. A new methodology for mapping geo(morpho)heritage on geo-morphological maps is presented in this paper. Nine iconic examples from the Italian landscape, selected in different morphogenetic and morphoclimatic contexts, are proposed to test the methodology in relation to point, polyline and polygon features. Moreover, guidelines for mapping are suggested according to the importance of the site and to the complexity of processes characterizing each case study.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Coratza_Advances_2021.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.48 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.