is study describes a treatment implemented with a 13.7-year-old child with Autism Spectrum Disorder (conventionally, S; IQ: 111) to enhance his capabilities in writing persuasive texts, a particularly challenging task for individuals with ASD without intellectual disability as it involves a set of socio-cognitive abilities in addition to specic writing skills to persuade a reader. e treatment was implemented via Skype during the lockdown caused by COVID-19. e asse ssment of the texts took place at three moments: baseline 1, baseline 2 after two weeks, and post-test after an 8 sessiontreatment. ree criteria were used: presence of structural components (topic, reasons, explanations, counter-arguments, ending); elaborateness of the components; amount of mental state terms. e comparison between S’ performance and typically developing controls at baseline 1 showed marked dierences in favour of the controls in all measures, which mostly disappeared at post-test. e discussion focuses on the interpretation of the improvements.
How to train a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder to write persuasive texts. A case study during the lockdown caused by Covid-19 / Melogno, Sergio; Pinto, Maria Antonietta; Scalisi, Teresa; Ruzza, Andrea. - In: NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TRENDS. - ISSN 1970-3201. - Aprile:29(2021), pp. 21-38. [10.7358/neur-2021-029-melo]
How to train a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder to write persuasive texts. A case study during the lockdown caused by Covid-19
Maria Antonietta Pinto;Teresa Gloria Scalisi;
2021
Abstract
is study describes a treatment implemented with a 13.7-year-old child with Autism Spectrum Disorder (conventionally, S; IQ: 111) to enhance his capabilities in writing persuasive texts, a particularly challenging task for individuals with ASD without intellectual disability as it involves a set of socio-cognitive abilities in addition to specic writing skills to persuade a reader. e treatment was implemented via Skype during the lockdown caused by COVID-19. e asse ssment of the texts took place at three moments: baseline 1, baseline 2 after two weeks, and post-test after an 8 sessiontreatment. ree criteria were used: presence of structural components (topic, reasons, explanations, counter-arguments, ending); elaborateness of the components; amount of mental state terms. e comparison between S’ performance and typically developing controls at baseline 1 showed marked dierences in favour of the controls in all measures, which mostly disappeared at post-test. e discussion focuses on the interpretation of the improvements.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.