The Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) assesses emotional processing in terms of suppression, signs of unprocessed emotion, controllability of emotions, avoidance of emotional triggers, and impoverished emotional experience. Previous confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) yielded insufficient fit and questioned the EPS factors' discriminant validity. The present study aimed to test unidimensional, five-factor, and bifactor models using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and CFA. We administered the scale to 350 Italian participants in good health and 346 gastrointestinal patients referred for endoscopy because of mild-to-severe gastrointestinal symptoms. ESEM models outperformed corresponding CFA models. The bifactor ESEM model was a good fit in single group analyses and achieved metric and scalar invariance in multigroup analyses. The inspection of latent mean differences revealed a consistent trend for patients to avoid emotional triggers and have less general emotional processing difficulties. The study clarified the EPS factor structure and supported its use to assess the emotional processing of medical patients and community participants.

The Structure of the Emotional Processing Scale (EPS-25). An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis Using Medical and Community Samples / Lauriola, M.; Donati, M. A.; Trentini, C.; Tomai, M.; Pontone, S.; Baker, R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 1015-5759. - 37:6(2021), pp. 423-432. [10.1027/1015-5759/a000632]

The Structure of the Emotional Processing Scale (EPS-25). An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis Using Medical and Community Samples

Lauriola M.
Primo
;
Donati M. A.;Trentini C.;Tomai M.;Pontone S.;Baker R.
2021

Abstract

The Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) assesses emotional processing in terms of suppression, signs of unprocessed emotion, controllability of emotions, avoidance of emotional triggers, and impoverished emotional experience. Previous confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) yielded insufficient fit and questioned the EPS factors' discriminant validity. The present study aimed to test unidimensional, five-factor, and bifactor models using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and CFA. We administered the scale to 350 Italian participants in good health and 346 gastrointestinal patients referred for endoscopy because of mild-to-severe gastrointestinal symptoms. ESEM models outperformed corresponding CFA models. The bifactor ESEM model was a good fit in single group analyses and achieved metric and scalar invariance in multigroup analyses. The inspection of latent mean differences revealed a consistent trend for patients to avoid emotional triggers and have less general emotional processing difficulties. The study clarified the EPS factor structure and supported its use to assess the emotional processing of medical patients and community participants.
2021
emotional processing; exploratory structural equation modeling; factor structure; gastrointestinal patients; measurement invariance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The Structure of the Emotional Processing Scale (EPS-25). An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis Using Medical and Community Samples / Lauriola, M.; Donati, M. A.; Trentini, C.; Tomai, M.; Pontone, S.; Baker, R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 1015-5759. - 37:6(2021), pp. 423-432. [10.1027/1015-5759/a000632]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lauriola_The-Structure-of-the-Emotional_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 202.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
202.43 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1507895
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact