Deep sternal wound infections are a serious complication following sternotomy for cardiothoracic surgery. “Conventional” treatment provides debridement and secondary closure or closed catheter irrigation. The combination of the Negative Pressure Therapy with flap coverages is an accepted technique and one or both Pectoralis Major muscles could be chosen. A multistep protocol was adopted. One hundred and sixty seven patients were treated with the combination of Negative Pressure Therapy with the Pectoralis Major muscle flap: 86 monolateral flap and 81 bilateral flap reconstruction. The main complications (hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, and re-infection), the need for re-intervention, mortality rates, Intensive Care Unit, and hospitalisation time were assessed. The mono-pectoralis group had fewer complications and need for revision, with a shorter hospital stay. A statistically significant difference emerged for the hematoma rate (P =.0079). Monolateral flap should to be preferred because with the same coverage effectiveness, it guarantees the saving of controlateral muscle with its functionality and the possibility of its use in case of failure. Furthermore, as the technique is less invasive, it can be reserved for more fragile patients.

Deep sternal wound infection following cardiac surgery. A comparison of the monolateral with the bilateral pectoralis major flaps / Lo Torto, F.; Turriziani, G.; Donato, C.; Marcasciano, M.; Redi, U.; Greco, M.; Miraldi, F.; Ribuffo, D.. - In: INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL. - ISSN 1742-4801. - 17:3(2020), pp. 683-691. [10.1111/iwj.13324]

Deep sternal wound infection following cardiac surgery. A comparison of the monolateral with the bilateral pectoralis major flaps

Lo Torto F.;Turriziani G.;Donato C.;Marcasciano M.;Redi U.;Greco M.;Miraldi F.;Ribuffo D.
2020

Abstract

Deep sternal wound infections are a serious complication following sternotomy for cardiothoracic surgery. “Conventional” treatment provides debridement and secondary closure or closed catheter irrigation. The combination of the Negative Pressure Therapy with flap coverages is an accepted technique and one or both Pectoralis Major muscles could be chosen. A multistep protocol was adopted. One hundred and sixty seven patients were treated with the combination of Negative Pressure Therapy with the Pectoralis Major muscle flap: 86 monolateral flap and 81 bilateral flap reconstruction. The main complications (hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, and re-infection), the need for re-intervention, mortality rates, Intensive Care Unit, and hospitalisation time were assessed. The mono-pectoralis group had fewer complications and need for revision, with a shorter hospital stay. A statistically significant difference emerged for the hematoma rate (P =.0079). Monolateral flap should to be preferred because with the same coverage effectiveness, it guarantees the saving of controlateral muscle with its functionality and the possibility of its use in case of failure. Furthermore, as the technique is less invasive, it can be reserved for more fragile patients.
2020
negative pressure therapy; pectoralis major muscle flap; sternal wound infection
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Deep sternal wound infection following cardiac surgery. A comparison of the monolateral with the bilateral pectoralis major flaps / Lo Torto, F.; Turriziani, G.; Donato, C.; Marcasciano, M.; Redi, U.; Greco, M.; Miraldi, F.; Ribuffo, D.. - In: INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL. - ISSN 1742-4801. - 17:3(2020), pp. 683-691. [10.1111/iwj.13324]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Lo-Torto_Deep-sternal-wound_2020.pdf

Open Access dal 18/02/2021

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 952.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
952.05 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1487801
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact