Background The existing frameworks for the evaluation of genetic and genomic applications clearly address the technical and clinical value of a test, but are less concerned with the way genetic services are delivered and organized. We therefore aimed to develop a comprehensive new framework that includes an assessment of service delivery. Methods A new framework was built on the evaluation dimensions identified through a systematic review of the existing frameworks and a Delphi survey of Italian experts in public health genomics. Results Our framework has four sections. The first two sections, respectively, guide the evidence collection process for the genetic test (analytic validity; clinical validity; clinical utility; personal utility) and its delivery models (organizational aspects; economic evaluation; ethical, legal and social implications; patient perspective). The third section guides the formulation of the research priorities to be addressed in future research. Finally, the fourth section suggests three criteria to summarize the collected evidence (net benefit, cost-effectiveness, feasibility). Conclusion We have successfully developed an evaluation framework for the evaluation of genetic tests that includes an assessment of service delivery. It also introduces some neglected evaluation dimensions such as personal utility and patient perspective.

A proposal of a new evaluation framework towards implementation of genetic tests / Pitini, E.; D'Andrea, E.; De Vito, C.; Rosso, A.; Unim, B.; Marzuillo, C.; Federici, A.; Maria, E. D.; Villari, P.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 14:8(2019), pp. 1-15. [10.1371/journal.pone.0219755]

A proposal of a new evaluation framework towards implementation of genetic tests

Pitini E.;D'Andrea E.;De Vito C.;Rosso A.;Unim B.;Marzuillo C.;Villari P.
2019

Abstract

Background The existing frameworks for the evaluation of genetic and genomic applications clearly address the technical and clinical value of a test, but are less concerned with the way genetic services are delivered and organized. We therefore aimed to develop a comprehensive new framework that includes an assessment of service delivery. Methods A new framework was built on the evaluation dimensions identified through a systematic review of the existing frameworks and a Delphi survey of Italian experts in public health genomics. Results Our framework has four sections. The first two sections, respectively, guide the evidence collection process for the genetic test (analytic validity; clinical validity; clinical utility; personal utility) and its delivery models (organizational aspects; economic evaluation; ethical, legal and social implications; patient perspective). The third section guides the formulation of the research priorities to be addressed in future research. Finally, the fourth section suggests three criteria to summarize the collected evidence (net benefit, cost-effectiveness, feasibility). Conclusion We have successfully developed an evaluation framework for the evaluation of genetic tests that includes an assessment of service delivery. It also introduces some neglected evaluation dimensions such as personal utility and patient perspective.
2019
adult; aged; delivery of health care; delphi technique; female; genetic testing; humans; male; middle aged
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A proposal of a new evaluation framework towards implementation of genetic tests / Pitini, E.; D'Andrea, E.; De Vito, C.; Rosso, A.; Unim, B.; Marzuillo, C.; Federici, A.; Maria, E. D.; Villari, P.. - In: PLOS ONE. - ISSN 1932-6203. - 14:8(2019), pp. 1-15. [10.1371/journal.pone.0219755]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pitini_proposal_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 622.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
622.21 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1415933
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact