Energy reduction can benefit from the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings. For this purpose, simulation models can be used both as diagnostic and prognostic tools, reproducing the behaviour of the real building as accurately as possible. High modelling accuracy can be achieved only through calibration. Two approaches can be adopted-manual or automatic. Manual calibration consists of an iterative trial and error procedure that requires high skill and expertise of the modeler. Automatic calibration relies on mathematical and statistical methods that mostly use optimization algorithms to minimize the difference between measured and simulated data. This paper aims to compare a manual calibration procedure with an automatic calibration method developed by the authors, coupling dynamic simulation, sensitivity analysis and automatic optimization using IDA ICE, Matlab and GenOpt respectively. Differences, advantages and disadvantages are evidenced applying both methods to a dynamic simulation model of a real office building in Rome, Italy. Although both methods require high expertise from operators and showed good results in terms of accuracy, automatic calibration presents better performance and consistently helps with speeding up the procedure.

Effectiveness of automatic and manual calibration of an office building energy model / Cornaro, C.; Bosco, F.; Lauria, M.; Puggioni, V. A.; De Santoli, L.. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 9:10(2019), pp. 1-29. [10.3390/app9101985]

Effectiveness of automatic and manual calibration of an office building energy model

Cornaro C.;De Santoli L.
2019

Abstract

Energy reduction can benefit from the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings. For this purpose, simulation models can be used both as diagnostic and prognostic tools, reproducing the behaviour of the real building as accurately as possible. High modelling accuracy can be achieved only through calibration. Two approaches can be adopted-manual or automatic. Manual calibration consists of an iterative trial and error procedure that requires high skill and expertise of the modeler. Automatic calibration relies on mathematical and statistical methods that mostly use optimization algorithms to minimize the difference between measured and simulated data. This paper aims to compare a manual calibration procedure with an automatic calibration method developed by the authors, coupling dynamic simulation, sensitivity analysis and automatic optimization using IDA ICE, Matlab and GenOpt respectively. Differences, advantages and disadvantages are evidenced applying both methods to a dynamic simulation model of a real office building in Rome, Italy. Although both methods require high expertise from operators and showed good results in terms of accuracy, automatic calibration presents better performance and consistently helps with speeding up the procedure.
2019
automatic optimization; buildings; calibration; dynamic simulation; GenOpt; IDA ICE; sensitivity analysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Effectiveness of automatic and manual calibration of an office building energy model / Cornaro, C.; Bosco, F.; Lauria, M.; Puggioni, V. A.; De Santoli, L.. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 9:10(2019), pp. 1-29. [10.3390/app9101985]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cornaro_ Effectiveness_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.39 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1356920
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact