A vertebral deformity (VD) is not always a vertebral fracture (VF). Because of lack of a completely satisfactory “gold standard”, there is no consensus on the exact definition of a VF. Therefore, it may sometimes be difficult, especially in mild cases, to discriminate the prevalent VF from a non-fracture deformity or short vertebral height (SVH). A combined standardized approach based on qualitative and semiquantitative (SQ) vertebral assessment may be the most option to correctly identify a VD as a VF. However this visual approach for VF identification is subjective, therefore it is mandatory an adequate training and experience of radiologist to reach a good sensitivity and specificity. Vertebral morphometry, objective and reproducible method, could be used only to evaluate the severity of VFs but requires the availability of reference values of vertebral height ratios. There is actually an evidentiary basis for suggesting that a qualitative approach by expert radiologists to morphological vertebral assessment, combined SQ and morphometric methods seem to be the preferred option for the correct diagnosis of VF as endplate or/and cortex fracture (ECF) or severe vertebral height loss.

How to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture? / Diacinti, D.; Guglielmi, G.. - In: QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY. - ISSN 2223-4292. - 9:9(2019), pp. 1485-1494. [10.21037/qims.2019.09.10]

How to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture?

Diacinti D.
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2019

Abstract

A vertebral deformity (VD) is not always a vertebral fracture (VF). Because of lack of a completely satisfactory “gold standard”, there is no consensus on the exact definition of a VF. Therefore, it may sometimes be difficult, especially in mild cases, to discriminate the prevalent VF from a non-fracture deformity or short vertebral height (SVH). A combined standardized approach based on qualitative and semiquantitative (SQ) vertebral assessment may be the most option to correctly identify a VD as a VF. However this visual approach for VF identification is subjective, therefore it is mandatory an adequate training and experience of radiologist to reach a good sensitivity and specificity. Vertebral morphometry, objective and reproducible method, could be used only to evaluate the severity of VFs but requires the availability of reference values of vertebral height ratios. There is actually an evidentiary basis for suggesting that a qualitative approach by expert radiologists to morphological vertebral assessment, combined SQ and morphometric methods seem to be the preferred option for the correct diagnosis of VF as endplate or/and cortex fracture (ECF) or severe vertebral height loss.
2019
vertebral fractures (VFs); vertebral deformities (VDs); endplate or/and cortex fractures (ECFs); semiquantitative vertebral assessment (SQ vertebral assessment); algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ); vertebral morphometry
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01m Editorial/Introduzione in rivista
How to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture? / Diacinti, D.; Guglielmi, G.. - In: QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY. - ISSN 2223-4292. - 9:9(2019), pp. 1485-1494. [10.21037/qims.2019.09.10]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Diacinti_How-to-define_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/29619/25730
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.53 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1356466
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact