This paper is concerned with the complexity of proofs and of searching for proofs in resolution. We show that the recently proposed algorithm of Ben-Sasson & Wigderson for searching for proofs in resolution cannot give better than weakly exponential performance. This is a consequence of our main result: we show the optimality of the general relationship called size-width tradeoff in Ben-Sasson & Wigderson. Moreover we obtain the optimality of the size-width tradeoff for the widely used restrictions of resolution: regular, Davis-Putnam, negative, positive.

Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution / Maria Luisa, Bonet; Galesi, Nicola. - In: COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY. - ISSN 1016-3328. - STAMPA. - 10:4(2001), pp. 261-276. [10.1007/s000370100000]

Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution

GALESI, NICOLA
2001

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the complexity of proofs and of searching for proofs in resolution. We show that the recently proposed algorithm of Ben-Sasson & Wigderson for searching for proofs in resolution cannot give better than weakly exponential performance. This is a consequence of our main result: we show the optimality of the general relationship called size-width tradeoff in Ben-Sasson & Wigderson. Moreover we obtain the optimality of the size-width tradeoff for the widely used restrictions of resolution: regular, Davis-Putnam, negative, positive.
2001
automated theorem proving; complexity of proofs; resolution
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution / Maria Luisa, Bonet; Galesi, Nicola. - In: COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY. - ISSN 1016-3328. - STAMPA. - 10:4(2001), pp. 261-276. [10.1007/s000370100000]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/133659
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact