This paper illustrates the results obtained in the last phase of the NACIE-UP benchmark activity foreseen inside the EU SESAME Project. The purpose of this research activity, performed by system thermal–hydraulic (STH) codes, is finalized to the improvement, development and validation of existing STH codes for Heavy Liquid Metal (HLM) systems. All the participants improved their modelling of the NACIE-UP facility, respect to the initial blind simulation phase, adopting the actual experimental boundary conditions and reducing as much as possible sources of uncertainty in their numerical model. Four different STH codes were employed by the participants to the benchmark to model the NACIE-UP facility, namely: CATHARE for ENEA, ATHLET for GRS, RELAP5-3D© for the “Sapienza” University of Rome and RELAP5/Mod3.3(modified) for the University of Pisa. Three reference tests foreseen in the NACIE-UP benchmark and carried out at ENEA Brasimone Research Centre were analysed from four participants. The data from the post-test analyses, performed independently by the participant using different STH codes, were compared together and with the available experimental results and critically discussed.

Post-test simulations for the NACIE-UP benchmark by STH codes / Forgione, N.; Martelli, D.; Barone, G.; Giannetti, F.; Lorusso, P.; Hollands, T.; Papukchiev, A.; Polidori, M.; Cervone, A.; Di Piazza, I.. - In: NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. - ISSN 0029-5493. - 353:(2019), pp. 1-14. [10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110279]

Post-test simulations for the NACIE-UP benchmark by STH codes

Giannetti F.;Lorusso P.;
2019

Abstract

This paper illustrates the results obtained in the last phase of the NACIE-UP benchmark activity foreseen inside the EU SESAME Project. The purpose of this research activity, performed by system thermal–hydraulic (STH) codes, is finalized to the improvement, development and validation of existing STH codes for Heavy Liquid Metal (HLM) systems. All the participants improved their modelling of the NACIE-UP facility, respect to the initial blind simulation phase, adopting the actual experimental boundary conditions and reducing as much as possible sources of uncertainty in their numerical model. Four different STH codes were employed by the participants to the benchmark to model the NACIE-UP facility, namely: CATHARE for ENEA, ATHLET for GRS, RELAP5-3D© for the “Sapienza” University of Rome and RELAP5/Mod3.3(modified) for the University of Pisa. Three reference tests foreseen in the NACIE-UP benchmark and carried out at ENEA Brasimone Research Centre were analysed from four participants. The data from the post-test analyses, performed independently by the participant using different STH codes, were compared together and with the available experimental results and critically discussed.
2019
uncertainty analysis; NACIE-UP; heavy liquid metal; experiment
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Post-test simulations for the NACIE-UP benchmark by STH codes / Forgione, N.; Martelli, D.; Barone, G.; Giannetti, F.; Lorusso, P.; Hollands, T.; Papukchiev, A.; Polidori, M.; Cervone, A.; Di Piazza, I.. - In: NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. - ISSN 0029-5493. - 353:(2019), pp. 1-14. [10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110279]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Forgione_Post-test_postprint_2019.pdf

Open Access dal 02/11/2021

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.74 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.74 MB Adobe PDF
Forgione_Post-test_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 5.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.23 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1309836
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact