In this paper, we demonstrate that standard central limit theorem (CLT) results do not hold for means of non-parametric, conditional efficiency estimators, and we provide new CLTs that permit applied researchers to make valid inference about mean conditional efficiency or to compare mean efficiency across groups of producers. The new CLTs are used to develop a test of the restrictive ‘separability’ condition that is necessary for second-stage regressions of efficiency estimates on environmental variables. We show that if this condition is violated, not only are second-stage regressions difficult to interpret and perhaps meaningless, but also first-stage, unconditional efficiency estimates are misleading. As such, the test developed here is of fundamental importance to applied researchers using non-parametric methods for efficiency estimation. The test is shown to be consistent and its local power is examined. Our simulation results indicate that our tests perform well both in terms of size and power. We provide a real-world empirical example by re-examining the paper by Aly et al. (1990, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211–18) and rejecting the separability assumption implicitly assumed by Aly et al., calling into question results that appear in hundreds of papers that have been published in recent years.

Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production / Daraio, C.; Simar, L.; Wilson, PAUL W.. - In: ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL. - ISSN 1368-4221. - 21:2(2018), pp. 170-191. [10.1111/ectj.12103]

Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production

Daraio C.
;
Simar L.
;
WILSON, PAUL W.
2018

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate that standard central limit theorem (CLT) results do not hold for means of non-parametric, conditional efficiency estimators, and we provide new CLTs that permit applied researchers to make valid inference about mean conditional efficiency or to compare mean efficiency across groups of producers. The new CLTs are used to develop a test of the restrictive ‘separability’ condition that is necessary for second-stage regressions of efficiency estimates on environmental variables. We show that if this condition is violated, not only are second-stage regressions difficult to interpret and perhaps meaningless, but also first-stage, unconditional efficiency estimates are misleading. As such, the test developed here is of fundamental importance to applied researchers using non-parametric methods for efficiency estimation. The test is shown to be consistent and its local power is examined. Our simulation results indicate that our tests perform well both in terms of size and power. We provide a real-world empirical example by re-examining the paper by Aly et al. (1990, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211–18) and rejecting the separability assumption implicitly assumed by Aly et al., calling into question results that appear in hundreds of papers that have been published in recent years.
2018
Conditional efficiency; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Free-disposal hull (FDH); Separability; Technical efficiency; Two-stage estimation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production / Daraio, C.; Simar, L.; Wilson, PAUL W.. - In: ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL. - ISSN 1368-4221. - 21:2(2018), pp. 170-191. [10.1111/ectj.12103]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Daraio_Central-limit-theorems_2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://academic.oup.com/ectj/article/21/2/170/5078970
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 223.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
223.29 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1305499
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 147
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 128
social impact