Non compensatory choices are widespread in the economics, strategic management and decision making. Nevertheless, many assessments of productivity still fail to consider non-compensatory preference structures in the measure of the technical inefficiency. This paper proposes a preference elicitation schema, typical of Multi-criteria decision analysis, for the selection of the directional vector in the assessment of a sustainable productivity. The direction choice is based on the weighted aggregation of concordance indexes for each decision criteria on each individual input, such that it represents an index of relative importance according to the decision maker’s perspective. The methodology can be used to aid resource allocation and saving, identify benchmarks for efficient practices and more generally for planning environmental policies in many services and industrial organizations. We illustrate the method with an environmental efficiency evaluation of Brazilian Federal Saving Bank branches.
Combining multi-criteria and directional distances to decompose non-compensatory measures of sustainable banking efficiency / Cavalcante, THYAGO CELSO NEPOMUCENO; Daraio, Cinzia; Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas. - In: APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS. - ISSN 1350-4851. - 27:4(2020), pp. 329-334. [10.1080/13504851.2019.1616051]
Combining multi-criteria and directional distances to decompose non-compensatory measures of sustainable banking efficiency
Nepomuceno, Thyago Celso Cavalcante
;Daraio, Cinzia;
2020
Abstract
Non compensatory choices are widespread in the economics, strategic management and decision making. Nevertheless, many assessments of productivity still fail to consider non-compensatory preference structures in the measure of the technical inefficiency. This paper proposes a preference elicitation schema, typical of Multi-criteria decision analysis, for the selection of the directional vector in the assessment of a sustainable productivity. The direction choice is based on the weighted aggregation of concordance indexes for each decision criteria on each individual input, such that it represents an index of relative importance according to the decision maker’s perspective. The methodology can be used to aid resource allocation and saving, identify benchmarks for efficient practices and more generally for planning environmental policies in many services and industrial organizations. We illustrate the method with an environmental efficiency evaluation of Brazilian Federal Saving Bank branches.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Nepomuceno_postprint_Combining-multi-criteria_2019.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1616051
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
805.97 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
805.97 kB | Adobe PDF | |
CavalcanteNepomuceno_Combining_2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
894.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
894.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.