We study maximal identifiability, a measure recently introduced in Boolean Network Tomography to characterize networks' capability to localize failure nodes in end-to-end path measurements. Under standard assumptions on topologies and on monitors placement, we prove tight upper and lower bounds on the maximal identifiability of failure nodes for specific classes of network topologies, such as trees, bounded-degree graphs, d-dimensional grids, in both directed and undirected cases. Among other results we prove that directed d-dimensional grids with support n have maximal identifiability d using nd monitors; and in the undirected case we show that 2d monitors suffice to get identifiability of d-1. We then study identifiability under embeddings: we establish relations between maximal identifiability, embeddability and dimension when network topologies are modelled as DAGs. Through our analysis we also refine and generalize results on limits of maximal identifiability recently obtained in [12] and [1]. Our results suggest the design of networks over N nodes with maximal identifiability Ω(√log N) using 2√log N monitors and heuristics to place monitors and edges in a network to boost maximal identifiability.

Tight bounds for maximal identifiability of failure nodes in boolean network tomography / Galesi, Nicola; Ranjbar, Fariba. - 2018-:(2018), pp. 212-222. ( 38th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS 2018 Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), aut ) [10.1109/ICDCS.2018.00030].

Tight bounds for maximal identifiability of failure nodes in boolean network tomography

Galesi, Nicola
;
RANJBAR, Fariba
2018

Abstract

We study maximal identifiability, a measure recently introduced in Boolean Network Tomography to characterize networks' capability to localize failure nodes in end-to-end path measurements. Under standard assumptions on topologies and on monitors placement, we prove tight upper and lower bounds on the maximal identifiability of failure nodes for specific classes of network topologies, such as trees, bounded-degree graphs, d-dimensional grids, in both directed and undirected cases. Among other results we prove that directed d-dimensional grids with support n have maximal identifiability d using nd monitors; and in the undirected case we show that 2d monitors suffice to get identifiability of d-1. We then study identifiability under embeddings: we establish relations between maximal identifiability, embeddability and dimension when network topologies are modelled as DAGs. Through our analysis we also refine and generalize results on limits of maximal identifiability recently obtained in [12] and [1]. Our results suggest the design of networks over N nodes with maximal identifiability Ω(√log N) using 2√log N monitors and heuristics to place monitors and edges in a network to boost maximal identifiability.
2018
38th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS 2018
Boolean Network Tomography; Dimension; Embeddings; Hypergrids; Maximal Identifiability; Node Failure Localization; Software; Hardware and Architecture; Computer Networks and Communications
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Tight bounds for maximal identifiability of failure nodes in boolean network tomography / Galesi, Nicola; Ranjbar, Fariba. - 2018-:(2018), pp. 212-222. ( 38th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS 2018 Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien), aut ) [10.1109/ICDCS.2018.00030].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Galesi_Tight_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 268.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
268.71 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1264316
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact