In order to face food insecurity as a global phenomenon, it is essential torely on measurement tools that guarantee comparability across countries. Althoughthe official indicator adopted by the United Nations in the context of the Sustain-able Development Goals (SDGs) and based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale(FIES) already embeds cross-country comparability, other experience-based scalescurrently employ national thresholds. In this paper we address the issue of compara-bility by presenting two different studies. The first one between FIES and three na-tional scales (ELCSA, EMSA and EBIA) included in national surveys in Guatemala,Ecuador, Mexico and Brazil. The second one between the adult and children ver-sions of these national scales. Different methods from the equating practice of edu-cational testing are explored: parametric, nonparametric, classical and based on theItem Response Theory (IRT).
Comparison between Experience-based Food Insecurity scales / Onori, Federica; Viviani, Sara; Brutti, Pierpaolo. - (2018), pp. 1-6. (Intervento presentato al convegno 49th Scientific meeting of the Italian Statistical Society tenutosi a Palermo).
Comparison between Experience-based Food Insecurity scales
Federica Onori
;Sara Viviani;Pierpaolo Brutti
2018
Abstract
In order to face food insecurity as a global phenomenon, it is essential torely on measurement tools that guarantee comparability across countries. Althoughthe official indicator adopted by the United Nations in the context of the Sustain-able Development Goals (SDGs) and based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale(FIES) already embeds cross-country comparability, other experience-based scalescurrently employ national thresholds. In this paper we address the issue of compara-bility by presenting two different studies. The first one between FIES and three na-tional scales (ELCSA, EMSA and EBIA) included in national surveys in Guatemala,Ecuador, Mexico and Brazil. The second one between the adult and children ver-sions of these national scales. Different methods from the equating practice of edu-cational testing are explored: parametric, nonparametric, classical and based on theItem Response Theory (IRT).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Onori_Comparison_2018.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.17 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.