A unique advantage of Psychological Inquiry’s format is that it encourages a free exchange of ideas allowing authors to “drill down” on points of disagreement and clarify possible misunderstandings. This is particularly helpful where an article asks its readers, as we do here, to revisit fundamental assumptions and reconsider widely accepted views. We are delighted at the opportunity to address the commentaries on our target article and explore the issues that they raise. Responses to our article differed appreciably in both attitude and substance. We were thrilled by commentators’ ideas that independently converged on our notions, were intrigued by the assimilation of our insights to other concerns, and welcomed the chance to respond to our critics. The reply that follows is organized by the major issues that the commentators raised and that illuminate fundamental facets of the cognitive consistency conundrum

All about cognitive consistency. A reply to commentaries / Kruglanski, Arie W.; Jasko, Katarzyna; Milyavsky, Maxim; Chernikova, Marina; Webber, David; Pierro, Antonio; di Santo, Daniela. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY. - ISSN 1047-840X. - 29:2(2018), pp. 109-116. [10.1080/1047840X.2018.1480656]

All about cognitive consistency. A reply to commentaries

Pierro, Antonio;di Santo, Daniela
2018

Abstract

A unique advantage of Psychological Inquiry’s format is that it encourages a free exchange of ideas allowing authors to “drill down” on points of disagreement and clarify possible misunderstandings. This is particularly helpful where an article asks its readers, as we do here, to revisit fundamental assumptions and reconsider widely accepted views. We are delighted at the opportunity to address the commentaries on our target article and explore the issues that they raise. Responses to our article differed appreciably in both attitude and substance. We were thrilled by commentators’ ideas that independently converged on our notions, were intrigued by the assimilation of our insights to other concerns, and welcomed the chance to respond to our critics. The reply that follows is organized by the major issues that the commentators raised and that illuminate fundamental facets of the cognitive consistency conundrum
2018
cognitive consistency; consistency/expectancy nexus; motivation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
All about cognitive consistency. A reply to commentaries / Kruglanski, Arie W.; Jasko, Katarzyna; Milyavsky, Maxim; Chernikova, Marina; Webber, David; Pierro, Antonio; di Santo, Daniela. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY. - ISSN 1047-840X. - 29:2(2018), pp. 109-116. [10.1080/1047840X.2018.1480656]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Kruglanski_All_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.25 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1184721
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact