Bullying is common in U.S. schools and is linked to emotional, behavioral, and academic risk for school-aged students. School policies and practices focused on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) have been designed to reduce bullying and show promising results. Most studies have drawn from students’ reports: We examined teachers’ reports of bullying problems in their schools along with their assessments of school safety, combined with principals’ reports of SOGI-focused policies and practices. Merging two independent sources of data from over 3,000 teachers (California School Climate Survey) and nearly 100 school principals (School Health Profiles) at the school level, we used multi-level models to understand bullying problems in schools. Our results show that SOGI-focused policies reported by principals do not have a strong independent association with teachers’ reports of bullying problems in their schools. However, in schools with more SOGI-focused policies, the association between teachers’ assessments of school safety and bullying problems is stronger. Recent developments in education law and policy in the United States and their relevance for student well-being are discussed.

Are school policies focused on sexual orientation and gender identity associated with less bullying? Teachers' perspectives / Russell, Stephen T.; Day, Jack K.; Ioverno, Salvatore; Toomey, Russell B.. - In: JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-4405. - STAMPA. - 54:(2016), pp. 29-38. [10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.005]

Are school policies focused on sexual orientation and gender identity associated with less bullying? Teachers' perspectives

Russell, Stephen T.;Ioverno, Salvatore;
2016

Abstract

Bullying is common in U.S. schools and is linked to emotional, behavioral, and academic risk for school-aged students. School policies and practices focused on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) have been designed to reduce bullying and show promising results. Most studies have drawn from students’ reports: We examined teachers’ reports of bullying problems in their schools along with their assessments of school safety, combined with principals’ reports of SOGI-focused policies and practices. Merging two independent sources of data from over 3,000 teachers (California School Climate Survey) and nearly 100 school principals (School Health Profiles) at the school level, we used multi-level models to understand bullying problems in schools. Our results show that SOGI-focused policies reported by principals do not have a strong independent association with teachers’ reports of bullying problems in their schools. However, in schools with more SOGI-focused policies, the association between teachers’ assessments of school safety and bullying problems is stronger. Recent developments in education law and policy in the United States and their relevance for student well-being are discussed.
2016
Gender identity; LGBT; principal reports; school policy; sexual orientation; teacher reports; bullying; female; humans; male; school health services; sexuality; students; United States; gender identity; policy; school teachers; schools; 3304; developmental and educational psychology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Are school policies focused on sexual orientation and gender identity associated with less bullying? Teachers' perspectives / Russell, Stephen T.; Day, Jack K.; Ioverno, Salvatore; Toomey, Russell B.. - In: JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-4405. - STAMPA. - 54:(2016), pp. 29-38. [10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.005]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Russel_School-policies.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 362.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
362.42 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1099156
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 45
social impact