This article investigates the scope and contents of CEDAW Art. 16, 1, g), which is the only provision within the international legal landscape to refer to the right to choose a family name. Originally, this provision was conceived by the drafters narrowly, to mean the freedom of the wife to keep her family (maiden) name in her personal and social life. The monitoring practice of the CmEDAW has subsequently widened the scope and contents of this provision, to cover the equal rights of the mother and of the father to pass their family name on their children. This article discusses the relevant practice of the CmEDAW, with special focus on its interpretative mandate regarding individual communications. The transmission of the mother’s surname on children has now emerged as a human right under the CEDAW and other international treaties on human rights. The ratio of this right is deeply-rooted in the principle of equality and non-discrimination between man and woman, husband and wife, father and mother. Although CEDAW Article 16, par. 1, g), is undisputedly the most appropriate legal tool giving ground to this right, the concrete application of this provision by the CmEDAW carries some main shortfalls.

The transmission of the mother’s surname under the cedaw / Fabbricotti, Alberta. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - STAMPA. - 2:(2017), pp. 465-475.

The transmission of the mother’s surname under the cedaw

FABBRICOTTI, Alberta
2017

Abstract

This article investigates the scope and contents of CEDAW Art. 16, 1, g), which is the only provision within the international legal landscape to refer to the right to choose a family name. Originally, this provision was conceived by the drafters narrowly, to mean the freedom of the wife to keep her family (maiden) name in her personal and social life. The monitoring practice of the CmEDAW has subsequently widened the scope and contents of this provision, to cover the equal rights of the mother and of the father to pass their family name on their children. This article discusses the relevant practice of the CmEDAW, with special focus on its interpretative mandate regarding individual communications. The transmission of the mother’s surname on children has now emerged as a human right under the CEDAW and other international treaties on human rights. The ratio of this right is deeply-rooted in the principle of equality and non-discrimination between man and woman, husband and wife, father and mother. Although CEDAW Article 16, par. 1, g), is undisputedly the most appropriate legal tool giving ground to this right, the concrete application of this provision by the CmEDAW carries some main shortfalls.
2017
family law; principle of equality between men and women; gender discrimination; cedaw; right of ttransmission of family name to children; european convention on human rights; european court of human right; human rights committee; un covenant on civil and political rights; international protection of human rights
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The transmission of the mother’s surname under the cedaw / Fabbricotti, Alberta. - In: DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 1971-7105. - STAMPA. - 2:(2017), pp. 465-475.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Fabbricotti_The-transmission_2017.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Note: Articolo pubblicato con copertina numero della rivista e indice
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 259.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
259.58 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1008839
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact