Background: Early insights into the timing of the start, peak, and intensity of the influenza season could be useful in planning influenza prevention and control activities. To encourage development and innovation in influenza forecasting, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) organized a challenge to predict the 2013-14 Unites States influenza season. Methods: Challenge contestants were asked to forecast the start, peak, and intensity of the 2013-2014 influenza season at the national level and at any or all Health and Human Services (HHS) region level(s). The challenge ran from December 1, 2013-March 27, 2014; contestants were required to submit 9 biweekly forecasts at the national level to be eligible. The selection of the winner was based on expert evaluation of the methodology used to make the prediction and the accuracy of the prediction as judged against the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet). Results: Nine teams submitted 13 forecasts for all required milestones. The first forecast was due on December 2, 2013; 3/13 forecasts received correctly predicted the start of the influenza season within one week, 1/13 predicted the peak within 1 week, 3/13 predicted the peak ILINet percentage within 1 %, and 4/13 predicted the season duration within 1 week. For the prediction due on December 19, 2013, the number of forecasts that correctly forecasted the peak week increased to 2/13, the peak percentage to 6/13, and the duration of the season to 6/13. As the season progressed, the forecasts became more stable and were closer to the season milestones. Conclusion: Forecasting has become technically feasible, but further efforts are needed to improve forecast accuracy so that policy makers can reliably use these predictions. CDC and challenge contestants plan to build upon the methods developed during this contest to improve the accuracy of influenza forecasts. © 2016 The Author(s).

Results from the centers for disease control and prevention's predict the 2013-2014 Influenza Season Challenge / Biggerstaff, Matthew; Alper, David; Dredze, Mark; Fox, Spencer; Fung, Isaac Chun Hai; Hickmann, Kyle S.; Lewis, Bryan; Rosenfeld, Roni; Shaman, Jeffrey; Tsou, Ming Hsiang; VELARDI, Paola; Vespignani, Alessandro; Finelli, Lyn; Chandra, Priyadarshini; Kaup, Hemchandra; Krishnan, Ramesh; Madhavan, Satish; Markar, Ashirwad; Pashley, Bryanne; Paul, Michael; Meyers, Lauren Ancel; Eggo, Rosalind; Henderson, Jette; Ramakrishnan, Anurekha; Scott, James; Singh, Bismark; Srinivasan, Ravi; Bakach, Iurii; Hao, Yi; Schaible, Braydon J.; Sexton, Jessica K.; Del Valle, Sara Y.; Deshpande, Alina; Fairchild, Geoffrey; Generous, Nicholas; Priedhorsky, Reid; Hickman, Kyle S.; Hyman, James M.; Brooks, Logan; Farrow, David; Hyun, Sangwon; Tibshirani, Ryan J.; Yang, Wan; Allen, Christopher; Aslam, Anoshã; Nagel, Anna; STILO, GIOVANNI; BASAGNI, Stefano; Zhang, Qian; PERRA, NICOLA; Chakraborty, Prithwish; Butler, Patrick; Khadivi, Pejman; Ramakrishnan, Naren; Chen, Jiangzhuo; Barrett, Chris; Bisset, Keith; Eubank, Stephen; Anil Kumar, V. S.; Laskowski, Kathy; Lum, Kristian; Marathe, Madhav; Aman, Susan; Brownstein, John S.; Goldstein, Ed; Lipsitch, Marc; Mekaru, Sumiko R.; Nsoesie, Elaine O.; GESUALDO, Francesco; Tozzi, Alberto E.; Broniatowski, David; Karspeck, Alicia; Tse, Zion Tsz Ho; Ying, Yuchen; Gambhir, Manoj; Scarpino, Sam. - In: BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - ISSN 1471-2334. - ELETTRONICO. - 16:1(2016). [10.1186/s12879-016-1669-x]

Results from the centers for disease control and prevention's predict the 2013-2014 Influenza Season Challenge

VELARDI, Paola;STILO, GIOVANNI;BASAGNI, stefano;PERRA, NICOLA;GESUALDO, Francesco;
2016

Abstract

Background: Early insights into the timing of the start, peak, and intensity of the influenza season could be useful in planning influenza prevention and control activities. To encourage development and innovation in influenza forecasting, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) organized a challenge to predict the 2013-14 Unites States influenza season. Methods: Challenge contestants were asked to forecast the start, peak, and intensity of the 2013-2014 influenza season at the national level and at any or all Health and Human Services (HHS) region level(s). The challenge ran from December 1, 2013-March 27, 2014; contestants were required to submit 9 biweekly forecasts at the national level to be eligible. The selection of the winner was based on expert evaluation of the methodology used to make the prediction and the accuracy of the prediction as judged against the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet). Results: Nine teams submitted 13 forecasts for all required milestones. The first forecast was due on December 2, 2013; 3/13 forecasts received correctly predicted the start of the influenza season within one week, 1/13 predicted the peak within 1 week, 3/13 predicted the peak ILINet percentage within 1 %, and 4/13 predicted the season duration within 1 week. For the prediction due on December 19, 2013, the number of forecasts that correctly forecasted the peak week increased to 2/13, the peak percentage to 6/13, and the duration of the season to 6/13. As the season progressed, the forecasts became more stable and were closer to the season milestones. Conclusion: Forecasting has become technically feasible, but further efforts are needed to improve forecast accuracy so that policy makers can reliably use these predictions. CDC and challenge contestants plan to build upon the methods developed during this contest to improve the accuracy of influenza forecasts. © 2016 The Author(s).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Biggerstaff_Results_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 872.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
872.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11573/997258
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 76
  • Scopus 109
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 107
social impact