In this paper, we address the question of how “green” growth differs from other patterns of economic growth. To this aim we analyze the control problem of a social optimum with waste, abatement and productive capital stocks. Consumption generates waste. We have two main results: (1) An environmental Keynes-Ramsey rule showing how along the transitional path, consumption dynamics is affected by capital and waste. One crucial implication is that faster waste emissions do not always call for faster abatement investment, and this effect can generate an overshooting in waste and productive capital stock, not present in the standard Keynes-Ramsey model. (2) In the steady state both productive capital stock and output are unchanged relative to the standard Ramsey model; nonetheless, the output composition changes since, to make room for abatement investment, steady state consumption must be reduced. We stress that, when abatement activities are treated as flows, the benefits and costs of abatement capital are greatly undervalued. It is the marginal impact of the whole abatement stock that impinges upon waste accumulation and current consumption, not only the additional unit of abatement activity.
Optimal waste control with abatement capital / Saltari, Enrico; Giuseppe, Travaglini. - In: JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0936-9937. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017). [10.1007/s00191-017-0516-6]
Optimal waste control with abatement capital
SALTARI, ENRICO;
2017
Abstract
In this paper, we address the question of how “green” growth differs from other patterns of economic growth. To this aim we analyze the control problem of a social optimum with waste, abatement and productive capital stocks. Consumption generates waste. We have two main results: (1) An environmental Keynes-Ramsey rule showing how along the transitional path, consumption dynamics is affected by capital and waste. One crucial implication is that faster waste emissions do not always call for faster abatement investment, and this effect can generate an overshooting in waste and productive capital stock, not present in the standard Keynes-Ramsey model. (2) In the steady state both productive capital stock and output are unchanged relative to the standard Ramsey model; nonetheless, the output composition changes since, to make room for abatement investment, steady state consumption must be reduced. We stress that, when abatement activities are treated as flows, the benefits and costs of abatement capital are greatly undervalued. It is the marginal impact of the whole abatement stock that impinges upon waste accumulation and current consumption, not only the additional unit of abatement activity.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Saltari_Optimal_2017.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
538.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
538.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


