Mini-open blind procedure versus limited open technique for carpal tunnel release: A 30-month follow-up study

Purpose: To evaluate prospectively the safety and effectiveness of a mini-open blind technique for carpal tunnel release (group A) when compared with a limited open technique (group B). Methods: From November 1999 to May 2001 (mean follow-up period, 30 mo) we performed 222 carpal tunnel release procedures on 185 consecutive patients. All patients were affected by mild to moderate median nerve compression. Patients in group A (82 patients, 99 procedures) had a short transverse incision at the wrist (length, 2 cm). We used a manual surgical instrument that helps in blindly dividing the flexor retinaculum because it-has an integrated light source. The light makes it possible to locate precisely the tool blade by transillumination. Patients in group B (103 patients, 123 procedures) had a limited longitudinal incision (length, 3-4 cm), The preoperative and postoperative patient statuses were evaluated with an Italian modified version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel questionnaire with a mean of 30 months' follow-up after surgery (range, 24-39 mo). Results: Group A patients showed better results than group B patients in all of the sections of the Italian modified version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel questionnaire at a mean follow-up period of 19 months, whereas after a mean of 30 months of follow-up evaluation the differences between groups A and B tended to decrease. Disease recurred in 7 group B patients, whereas only 1 patient in group A experienced symptom recurrence at the latest office evaluation. Conclusions: The blind mini-invasive technique has been shown to be as safe as traditional techniques but the recovery period is significantly shortened. With the technique we described a low recurrence rate was observed. All patients in group A reported great reduction in preoperative pain and numbness.