Introduction: Superficial veins in the upper arm differ according to their relationship to the superficial fascia. We investigated the echographic landmark of the cephalic vein (CV) to correctly distinguish it from the collateral accessory vein (CAV) before hemodialysis angioaccess creation. Materials and method: Twenty consecutive patients were evaluated by ultrasonographic scan. The echographic features of CV and CAV together with their relationship were described. Results: Ninety-five percent of patients presented both CV and CAV (75% CAV laterally located, 25% medially located). CV and CAV diameters were 2.9 (±0.65) and 2.0 (±0.70), respectively. Conclusions: CV differs from CAV for its anatomic location at forearm. Such a difference is clearly evident under ultrasound examination, despite any recommendation in ultrasound guidelines. Whether the exclusive use of CV for angioaccess creation can lead to a better outcome will be ascertained by further studies.

Echographic landmark of cephalic and collateral accessory vein at forearm in preoperative evaluation for hemodialysis angioaccess / Pirozzi, Nicola; Giuliani, A; Scrivano, Jacopo; Pettorini, Laura; Fazzari, Loredana; Punzo, G; Mene', Paolo. - In: JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS. - ISSN 1129-7298. - 16:5(2015), pp. 364-366. [10.5301/jva.5000443]

Echographic landmark of cephalic and collateral accessory vein at forearm in preoperative evaluation for hemodialysis angioaccess

PIROZZI, NICOLA
;
Giuliani, A;SCRIVANO, JACOPO;PETTORINI, LAURA;FAZZARI, LOREDANA;Punzo, G;MENE', Paolo
2015

Abstract

Introduction: Superficial veins in the upper arm differ according to their relationship to the superficial fascia. We investigated the echographic landmark of the cephalic vein (CV) to correctly distinguish it from the collateral accessory vein (CAV) before hemodialysis angioaccess creation. Materials and method: Twenty consecutive patients were evaluated by ultrasonographic scan. The echographic features of CV and CAV together with their relationship were described. Results: Ninety-five percent of patients presented both CV and CAV (75% CAV laterally located, 25% medially located). CV and CAV diameters were 2.9 (±0.65) and 2.0 (±0.70), respectively. Conclusions: CV differs from CAV for its anatomic location at forearm. Such a difference is clearly evident under ultrasound examination, despite any recommendation in ultrasound guidelines. Whether the exclusive use of CV for angioaccess creation can lead to a better outcome will be ascertained by further studies.
2015
cephalic vein; av fistula; hemodialysis; angioaccess
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Echographic landmark of cephalic and collateral accessory vein at forearm in preoperative evaluation for hemodialysis angioaccess / Pirozzi, Nicola; Giuliani, A; Scrivano, Jacopo; Pettorini, Laura; Fazzari, Loredana; Punzo, G; Mene', Paolo. - In: JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS. - ISSN 1129-7298. - 16:5(2015), pp. 364-366. [10.5301/jva.5000443]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pirozzi_Echographic-landmark_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 599.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
599.91 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/978739
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact