Background and purpose: We have revised the previous EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain (NP) assessment, which aimed to provide recommendations for the diagnostic process, screening tools and questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing (QST), microneurography, pain-related reflexes and evoked potentials, functional neuroimaging and skin biopsy. Methods: We have checked and rated the literature published in the period 2004-2009, according to the EFNS method of classification for diagnostic procedures. Results: Most of the previous recommendations were reinforced by the new studies. The main revisions relate to: (i) the new definition of NP and a diagnostic grading system; (ii) several new validated clinical screening tools that identify NP components, and questionnaires which assess the different types of NP; (iii) recent high-quality studies on laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and skin biopsy. Conclusions: History and bedside examination are still fundamental to a correct diagnosis, whilst screening tools and questionnaires are useful in indicating probable NP; QST is also useful for indicating the latter, and to assess provoked pains and treatment response. Amongst laboratory tests, LEPs are the best tool for assessing A delta pathway dysfunction, and skin biopsy for assessing neuropathies with distal loss of unmyelinated nerve fibres.

EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009 / Cruccu, Giorgio; C., Sommer; P., Anand; N., Attal; R., Baron; L., Garcia Larrea; M., Haanpaa; T. S., Jensen; J., Serra; R. D., Treede. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 1351-5101. - 17:8(2010), pp. 1010-1018. [10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x]

EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009

CRUCCU, Giorgio;
2010

Abstract

Background and purpose: We have revised the previous EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain (NP) assessment, which aimed to provide recommendations for the diagnostic process, screening tools and questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing (QST), microneurography, pain-related reflexes and evoked potentials, functional neuroimaging and skin biopsy. Methods: We have checked and rated the literature published in the period 2004-2009, according to the EFNS method of classification for diagnostic procedures. Results: Most of the previous recommendations were reinforced by the new studies. The main revisions relate to: (i) the new definition of NP and a diagnostic grading system; (ii) several new validated clinical screening tools that identify NP components, and questionnaires which assess the different types of NP; (iii) recent high-quality studies on laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and skin biopsy. Conclusions: History and bedside examination are still fundamental to a correct diagnosis, whilst screening tools and questionnaires are useful in indicating probable NP; QST is also useful for indicating the latter, and to assess provoked pains and treatment response. Amongst laboratory tests, LEPs are the best tool for assessing A delta pathway dysfunction, and skin biopsy for assessing neuropathies with distal loss of unmyelinated nerve fibres.
2010
functional neuroimaging; quantitative sensory testing; neuropathic pain; evoked potentials; skin biopsy; screening tools
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009 / Cruccu, Giorgio; C., Sommer; P., Anand; N., Attal; R., Baron; L., Garcia Larrea; M., Haanpaa; T. S., Jensen; J., Serra; R. D., Treede. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 1351-5101. - 17:8(2010), pp. 1010-1018. [10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/97865
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 103
  • Scopus 453
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 353
social impact