Impedance plethysmography is a technique which allows the monitoring of respiratory activity through the measurement of variations in the trans-thoracic impedance. Provided the measurement system has enough sensitivity, the same technique can also detect heartbeats, thus adding cardiac activity monitoring capabilities. In this paper, a comparison is performed between 2-electrode and 4-electrode systems, considering both volt-amperometric and AC-bridge solutions. Attention is focused on low-cost, easily portable, and reconfigurable measurement set-ups, whose performances are analyzed in terms of sensitivity and accuracy. To this end, LabVIEW virtual instruments based on a data acquisition card are employed. An experimental metrological assessment of the systems shows that their basic accuracy is definitely adequate for patient monitoring. However, based on a theoretical study on measurement resolution, only the volt-amperometric solution in 4-electrode configuration achieves enough sensitivity to correctly detect the cardiac activity. The above conclusion is verified by acquisitions made on several volunteers.

Comparison among low-cost portable systems for thoracic impedance plethysmography / Piuzzi, Emanuele; Pisa, Stefano; Pittella, Erika; Podesta', Luca; Sangiovanni, Silvia. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017), pp. 545-551. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference tenutosi a Torino, Italy nel May 22-25, 2017) [10.1109/I2MTC.2017.7969747].

Comparison among low-cost portable systems for thoracic impedance plethysmography

PIUZZI, Emanuele;PISA, Stefano;PITTELLA, ERIKA;PODESTA', Luca;SANGIOVANNI, Silvia
2017

Abstract

Impedance plethysmography is a technique which allows the monitoring of respiratory activity through the measurement of variations in the trans-thoracic impedance. Provided the measurement system has enough sensitivity, the same technique can also detect heartbeats, thus adding cardiac activity monitoring capabilities. In this paper, a comparison is performed between 2-electrode and 4-electrode systems, considering both volt-amperometric and AC-bridge solutions. Attention is focused on low-cost, easily portable, and reconfigurable measurement set-ups, whose performances are analyzed in terms of sensitivity and accuracy. To this end, LabVIEW virtual instruments based on a data acquisition card are employed. An experimental metrological assessment of the systems shows that their basic accuracy is definitely adequate for patient monitoring. However, based on a theoretical study on measurement resolution, only the volt-amperometric solution in 4-electrode configuration achieves enough sensitivity to correctly detect the cardiac activity. The above conclusion is verified by acquisitions made on several volunteers.
2017
2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference
automatic test equipment; impedance measurement; measurement resolution; measurement uncertainty; patient monitoring; plethysmography; wearable sensors
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Comparison among low-cost portable systems for thoracic impedance plethysmography / Piuzzi, Emanuele; Pisa, Stefano; Pittella, Erika; Podesta', Luca; Sangiovanni, Silvia. - ELETTRONICO. - (2017), pp. 545-551. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference tenutosi a Torino, Italy nel May 22-25, 2017) [10.1109/I2MTC.2017.7969747].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Piuzzi_Comparison-2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 410.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
410.99 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/972593
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact